Search Results for "code%20editor"

Gleam's powerful static type system helps find and prevent bugs at compile time, long before it reaches your users. It also serves as a productive refactoring tool, enabling programmers to confidently make large changes to unfamiliar code, quickly and with low risk. For problems, the type system can't solve (such as your server being hit by a bolt of lightning) the Erlang virtual machine provides well-tested mechanisms for gracefully handling failure. Hunting down bugs can be stressful so Gleam's compiler provides clear and helpful feedback about any problems. We want to spend more time developing features and less time looking for bugs or deciphering cryptic error messages. ...

Claude’s C Compiler is a remarkable experiment in automated software generation: a full C compiler written from scratch in Rust entirely by an AI model (Claude Opus 4.6) with minimal human intervention, capable of targeting multiple architectures like x86-64, i686, ARM, and RISC-V. The project implements every part of a traditional compiler — the lexer, parser, intermediate representation, optimizer, code generator, assembler, linker, and debug info emitter — without relying on any external toolchain, producing standalone executables in the ELF format. While still early and not fully validated for correctness, it demonstrates the frontier of what sophisticated AI can build in complex, systems-level software domains, including the potential to compile real operating systems and large software projects.

...Its README and community reactions suggest a mix of satire and extreme experimentation: the project makes “unsafe” Rust easier to use by removing typical compile-time checks, pushing the language toward behavior more like C for cases where developers want total control. Although controversial, the code serves as an exploration of Rust internals and unsafe constructs, and it includes utilities intended to simplify memory management and pointer manipulation without safety checks. This can be attractive to low-level systems programmers who are comfortable with risks and want to squeeze out performance or experiment with unconventional language behavior.