Search Results for "local"

...It operates as a desktop application with CLI integration, allowing users to launch reviews directly from their terminal while keeping all processing local to ensure security and prevent data leakage. The system presents reviews as hierarchical task trees, enabling developers to work through changes step by step, attach notes, and track progress across different review concerns.

I’d like to introduce reviewdog! An automated code review tool working with any lint tools and supports local run as well. “reviewdog” provides a way to post review comments to code hosting services, such as GitHub, automatically by integrating with any linter tools with ease. It uses any output of lint tools, with translation if required, and posts them as a comment if the file and line are in diff of patches to review. reviewdog also supports running in a local environment to filter the output of lint tools by diff. ...

...Developers can configure model endpoints, making it adaptable to different LLM providers and deployment needs. Its main value is bringing large-scale, agent-assisted review workflows into local and CI-based development environments.

...The design of the Super-Linter is currently to allow linting to occur in GitHub Actions as a part of continuous integration occurring on pull requests as the commits get pushed. It works best when commits are being pushed early and often to a branch with an open or draft pull request. There is some desire to move this closer to local development for faster feedback on linting errors but this is not yet supported. There is no need to set the GitHub Secret as it is automatically set by GitHub, it only needs to be passed to the action.