Search Results for "can"

...It uses any output of lint tools, with translation if required, and posts them as a comment if the file and line are in diff of patches to review. reviewdog also supports running in a local environment to filter the output of lint tools by diff. We can use various linters and static code analysis tools to detect such problems in local machines, editors, CI services. However, here is the problem. Static analysis tools may report false-positive results. Reporting false-positive results itself is ok, but due to the false-positive results we cannot make build fail and it becomes difficult for us to find true positive results from messed up analysis results.

...The tool reads Git diffs, analyzes changed files, and generates structured review comments with line-level precision. It is designed to go beyond shallow diff feedback by letting the agent inspect full files, search the codebase, and use surrounding context. Developers can configure model endpoints, making it adaptable to different LLM providers and deployment needs. Its main value is bringing large-scale, agent-assisted review workflows into local and CI-based development environments.

...At the core of this experience is security – developers should be able to go faster without increasing the risk of introducing changes that can hurt their products, users, and organizations.

...By "distributed", we mean that code reviews are stored inside of the repository as git objects. Every developer on your team has their own copy of the review history that they can push or pull. When pulling, updates from the remote repo are automatically merged by the tool. This design removes the need for any sort of server-side setup. As a result, this tool can work with any git hosting provider, and the only setup required is installing the client on your workstation. he git command-line tool is configured with the credentials it needs to push to and pull from the remote repos. ...