Search Results for "ddc/ci"

Align initiatives with strategic priorities, accelerate software delivery, and drive continuous improvement with the leading Engineering Intelligence Solution. Software development teams used to operate in the dark, forced to make decisions based on gut feel and anecdotes, causing friction, creating silos, and leading to mediocre outcomes. Today, forward-thinking engineering leaders leverage data-driven insights to build a culture of trust and high performance. Align on business priorities...

SonarQube empowers all developers to write cleaner and safer code. Thousands of automated Static Code Analysis rules, protecting your app on multiple fronts, and guiding your team. Catch tricky bugs to prevent undefined behavior from impacting end-users. Fix vulnerabilities that compromise your app, and learn AppSec along the way with Security Hotspots. Make sure your codebase is clean and maintainable, to increase developer velocity! We embrace progress - whether it's multi-language...

A tool designed to automate code refactoring for developers, reducing technical debt and improving code quality.

...Because it continuously evaluates changes, it can catch inefficiencies and suggest enhancements both while typing and during dedicated refactor passes. Teams can standardize code quality across codebases by adopting Sourcery’s automated suggestions as part of review or CI pipelines.

...It uses any output of lint tools, with translation if required, and posts them as a comment if the file and line are in diff of patches to review. reviewdog also supports running in a local environment to filter the output of lint tools by diff. We can use various linters and static code analysis tools to detect such problems in local machines, editors, CI services. However, here is the problem. Static analysis tools may report false-positive results. Reporting false-positive results itself is ok, but due to the false-positive results we cannot make build fail and it becomes difficult for us to find true positive results from messed up analysis results.

...PHP_CodeSniffer requires PHP version 5.4.0 or greater, although individual sniffs may have additional requirements such as external applications and scripts. See the Configuration Options manual page for a list of these requirements. If you're using PHP_CodeSniffer as part of a team, or you're running it on a CI server, you may want to configure your project's settings using a configuration file. If you use PEAR, you can install PHP_CodeSniffer using the PEAR installer. This will make the phpcs and phpcbf commands immediately available for use.