Text Me: Second Phone Number for Android

Virtual secondary line — useful, not flawless

Quick summary

• Offers a separate phone number for calls and texts over Wi‑Fi or mobile data, avoiding the need for a second SIM.
• Setup and interface are straightforward: messages, calls and voicemail are separated into easy‑to‑navigate sections.
• Global texting and calling capabilities make it suitable for international use.
• Users report uneven reliability: message delivery and call connections sometimes fail, and the app can freeze or log users out.
• The free tier is ad‑supported and some important tasks (like receiving certain verification codes) may require paid credits or a subscription.
• Customer support and billing transparency have been criticized, which can complicate long‑term use.

How it helps

Text Me: Second Phone Number provides a convenient way to add a digital phone line to a single device. It supports SMS and MMS, and routes voice calls through the internet, which can be handy for separating personal and professional conversations or managing multiple contact lists. Many people appreciate the simple onboarding and the way messaging, calling and voicemail are grouped so conversations are easy to find.

Where it falls short

Despite its conveniences, performance varies between users. Common issues include delayed or missing texts, dropped or failed calls, and occasional app instability such as freezing or unexpected sign‑outs. Those quirks can undermine reliability when you need consistent, real‑time communication.

Cost model and ads

The no‑cost experience is heavily ad‑driven; advertisements are frequent and can interrupt use. Additionally, several features that users expect to be free—most notably receiving certain verification or confirmation codes—may be gated behind paid credits or a subscription plan. Some customers have also reported unclear billing practices and slow support responses.

Final assessment

As a practical option for adding a secondary number without extra hardware, this app can be effective for casual or infrequent use. Its global reach and simple interface are strengths, but inconsistent connection quality and a subscription‑leaning monetization approach create tradeoffs. If dependable, mission‑critical communication is required, consider evaluating alternative services that emphasize stability and clearer pricing.