-
Thanks again.
We tried but failed to get autoconf to correctly auto-generate the
HAVE_NETCDF4_H
token, which is the only NCO patch required.
Still working on it...
Charlie.
2009-11-15 22:01:25 UTC in NCO netCDF Operators
-
you're welcome. always feels good to solve an annyoying but easy to fix problem that affects a lot of users. yes, the fix is only available in cvs for now.
c.
2009-11-09 20:02:51 UTC in NCO netCDF Operators
-
zender committed patchset 5109 of module nco to the NCO netCDF Operators CVS repository, changing 3 files.
2009-11-08 07:19:22 UTC in NCO netCDF Operators
-
zender committed patchset 5108 of module nco to the NCO netCDF Operators CVS repository, changing 4 files.
2009-11-08 06:48:17 UTC in NCO netCDF Operators
-
Clarification: this exception list only applies to files that use the CF convention or earlier but similiar conventions.
2009-11-07 23:08:15 UTC in NCO netCDF Operators
-
As a first step in improving the logic for deciding whether to arithmeticaly process (e.g., difference, ensemble-average) "coordinate-like" dimensions, such as lat and lon in NARCCAP files, and latixy and longxy in CLM files, I have simply created an empirical exception list.
The current snapshot will not difference variables named lat, lon, lev, longxy or latixy. The next step would be to...
2009-11-07 23:05:25 UTC in NCO netCDF Operators
-
zender committed patchset 5107 of module nco to the NCO netCDF Operators CVS repository, changing 2 files.
2009-11-07 22:59:56 UTC in NCO netCDF Operators
-
zender committed patchset 5106 of module nco to the NCO netCDF Operators CVS repository, changing 7 files.
2009-11-07 22:54:55 UTC in NCO netCDF Operators
-
please post the NCO version you are using,
e.g., results of ncks -r
and make available a small sample file1.nc
thx,
c.
2009-11-07 06:05:57 UTC in NCO netCDF Operators
-
NCO will not difference coordinate variables but will difference
all other numeric variables. Since your lat and lon are 2D, NCO
does not consider them to be coordinates in the netCDF sense.
So they are treated as regular variables. This seems a little quaint
and old fashioned now that users are switched to irregular grids, but
you are the first person I can remember who has reported this...
2009-11-07 05:46:28 UTC in NCO netCDF Operators
