Thomas Schraitle

Show:

What's happening?

  • dbfo-need PI and invalid FO in FOP

    Hi, when using FOP 0.95 with the dbfo-need processing instruction, you get validation errors. According to Bob Stayton, the dbfo-need is not supported by FOP: »The processor must be able to execute a negative value for space-before, and FOP cannot. The stylesheet currently ignores dbfo-need when fop.extensions="1", and now it appears it must also ignore it when fop1.extensions="1".«.

    2009-07-03 06:32:29 UTC in DocBook

  • DocBook

    tom_schr committed revision 8462 to the DocBook SVN repository, changing 1 files.

    2009-06-22 12:20:14 UTC in DocBook

  • DocBook

    tom_schr committed revision 8461 to the DocBook SVN repository, changing 1 files.

    2009-06-22 12:15:24 UTC in DocBook

  • DocBook

    tom_schr committed revision 8460 to the DocBook SVN repository, changing 1 files.

    2009-06-22 12:11:18 UTC in DocBook

  • DocBook

    tom_schr committed revision 8459 to the DocBook SVN repository, changing 2 files.

    2009-06-22 11:59:27 UTC in DocBook

  • DocBook

    tom_schr committed revision 8458 to the DocBook SVN repository, changing 1 files.

    2009-06-21 16:39:53 UTC in DocBook

  • DocBook

    tom_schr committed revision 8457 to the DocBook SVN repository, changing 1 files.

    2009-06-21 13:31:06 UTC in DocBook

  • Comment: citebiblioid encountered in para, but no template matches

    Sorry for the delay. I tried it with the latest snapshot (15-Sep-2008 19:40; r8126) and it seems to work. Thanks!

    2008-09-20 13:25:32 UTC in DocBook

  • funsynopsis: No PI <?dbfo funcsynopsis-style?> available

    The PI [1] can influence the appearance of funcprototype to display it in K&R or ANSI style. However, this can only be used for HTML. For FO an equivalent PI like is missing (see [2]). Consequences: You can only choose the global appearance of a funcprototype, but no individual entries. Version 1.73.2 fo/synop.xsl...

    2007-11-25 20:36:24 UTC in DocBook

  • citebiblioid encountered in para, but no template matches

    According to Killian [1] citebiblioid in para is not processed. It is confirmed by Bob and me. Bob wrotes: »The citebiblioid element was added in DocBook 4.2, which is about 5 years old. As far as I can tell, it has never been handled by the XSL stylesheets.« The report on the mailinglist was orginally for FO but it is also known not to work for online output. -------- [1]...

    2007-11-05 06:52:52 UTC in DocBook

About Me

  • 2000-04-21 (10 years ago)
  • 27667
  • tom_schr (My Site)
  • Thomas Schraitle

Send me a message