spyke555

Show:

What's happening?

  • Followup: RE: Device within a device

    Okay, that typo and the fact that they don't mention that the a device's address list needs to contain a reference to itself threw me off. Easy enough to fix though... Thanks!

    2009-11-09 21:50:51 UTC in Visual Test Shell for BACnet

  • Followup: RE: Testing for empty list

    Perfect, thank you!

    2009-11-09 16:01:19 UTC in Visual Test Shell for BACnet

  • Followup: RE: Device within a device

    Is this a VTS requirements or a BACnet one? Searched through the BACnet standard and could not find this as a requirement. Annex D of 135-2008 section D.11 does show a simple device (Device,2) which contains another device in it (Device,9) but it does not contain itself... Thanks!

    2009-11-09 16:00:01 UTC in Visual Test Shell for BACnet

  • Device within a device

    Hello everyone, VTS flags the following consistancy error when I load the EPICS for my test device: EPICS Consistency Errors: 1) 135.1-2003 5.(h): (Device,75) is defined in the test database but does not appear in the Object_List. The system I am developing has a single device and 25 analog inputs and so I've defined the object list for the device in the following way:

    2009-11-07 15:40:31 UTC in Visual Test Shell for BACnet

  • Testing for empty list

    Hello everyone, I am trying to test a device with an empty device-address-binding property. I've defined the EPICS in the following manner: { object-identifier: (device,75) ... device-address-binding: () ... } The resulting script to test this property looks like this: TEST#1.34 - Read device-address-binding...

    2009-11-07 14:30:46 UTC in Visual Test Shell for BACnet

About Me

  • 2006-08-04 (3 years ago)
  • 1568748
  • spyke555 (My Site)
  • spyke555

Send me a message