-
An ID is conceptually required on start-of-range indexterms, is it practical to make the xml:id required in the RELAX NG for this pattern?.
2009-11-19 13:56:34 UTC in DocBook
-
Surely it's just bizarre for indexterms to have linking attributes. What on earth could this possibly mean:
foo
I propose that we announce in 5.1 that we'll be removing the linking attributes from indexterm and friends.
2009-11-19 12:43:04 UTC in DocBook
-
The DocBook is reluctant to add conref. Several TC members
familiar with DITA implementations assert that it's problematic
and difficult to implement. What's more, it doesn't really solve
the problems associated with duplicate IDs because IDs on the
descendants of the conref'd element may be duplicates.
The specific problem that conref solves can be addressed by
XPointer schemes less...
2009-11-18 13:50:32 UTC in DocBook
-
nwalsh committed revision 8533 to the DocBook SVN repository, changing 1 files.
2009-11-18 12:53:29 UTC in DocBook
-
nwalsh committed revision 8529 to the DocBook SVN repository, changing 1 files.
2009-10-26 22:28:24 UTC in DocBook
-
Moved to stylesheet bug list.
2009-08-19 18:28:40 UTC in DocBook
-
nwalsh committed revision 8488 to the DocBook SVN repository, changing 1 files.
2009-07-15 19:45:55 UTC in DocBook
-
The intent of the additional constraint is to forbid indexterms from appearing in footnotes or in the descendants of footnotes. I agree that it's ambiguously worded at the moment and I'll fix that.
It's a consequence of grammar based schema languages (like DTDs, RELAX NG, and W3C XML Schema) that it is very difficult to exclude elements from some contexts. Since indexterms are allowed in para,
2009-07-15 18:28:26 UTC in DocBook
-
nwalsh committed revision 8480 to the DocBook SVN repository, changing 2 files.
2009-07-13 14:22:14 UTC in DocBook
-
nwalsh committed revision 8479 to the DocBook SVN repository, changing 2 files.
2009-07-13 13:53:53 UTC in DocBook
