-
In /ocsreports/languages italian.png, polish.png and
portuguese.png are empty files since version 1.2.
Version 1.1 files are correct.
2006-08-23 13:49:31 UTC in Open Computers and Software Inventory
-
This patch rectify some mistakes in French translation.
2005-09-16 15:34:18 UTC in Serendipity PHP Weblog System
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=14397
I got the same error. Hashes modified are generated with old
vhosts or even other hosts information.
The only way I found to get rid of this bug is to restart
ispman-agent.
2005-06-01 17:17:36 UTC in ispman
-
This project is now hosted on savannah.gnu.org. You should check there for latest files.
2003-01-08 19:36:16 UTC in gAcc
-
mverdier committed patchset 8 of module docs to the gaw CVS repository, changing 2 files.
2002-10-08 09:19:24 UTC in gaw
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=14397
"check that option" in fact. All is fine with it.
Ok I should read your doc...
2002-09-07 21:29:09 UTC in Firewall Builder
-
Some rules are automaticaly inserted at start like
those (fwb_iptables v1.0.0) :
iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp ! --syn -m state --state NEW
-j LOG
iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp ! --syn -m state --state NEW
-j DROP
This is ok but not always.
Some invalid packets are generated somewhere on the
loopback.
They are logged and dropped.
For limiting logging, it could be nice to enable all...
2002-09-07 19:55:40 UTC in Firewall Builder
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=14397
Ok for eth0.
I understand your problem. And yes you should use all
interfaces to obtain addresses. But then you should
eliminate redundancy.
I do not think it is an error to affect the same address to
different interfaces. In my case eth0 does not have a
network and is not included in routing table. But I will
delete it from fwbuilder since ppp0 and eth0...
2002-08-19 17:21:03 UTC in Firewall Builder
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=14397
eth0 and eth1 have the same address. eth0 is just an
interface to the modem, no need for a different address.
ppp0 is the usefull interface for that.
But the point I think is : why do you use different
interfaces for a rule in one particular interface ? You
should generate just one line for this interface.
And I think there is a really double :
iptables...
2002-08-19 11:59:27 UTC in Firewall Builder
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=14397
So you should use all _different_ addresses.
In fact I was wrong, the duplicated code is for an interface
rule : rule #0 for ppp0. In this context you should only use
the address for this interface. Am I right ?.
2002-08-18 09:28:29 UTC in Firewall Builder
