Frank Gibson

Show:

What's happening?

  • OBI

    fgibson_sf committed revision 2144 to the OBI SVN repository, changing 1 files.

    2009-10-12 10:07:14 UTC in OBI

  • OBI

    fgibson_sf committed revision 2132 to the OBI SVN repository, changing 1 files.

    2009-10-09 16:25:06 UTC in OBI

  • OBI

    fgibson_sf committed revision 2129 to the OBI SVN repository, changing 1 files.

    2009-10-08 16:20:51 UTC in OBI

  • Comment: Cellular_component

    To further highlight this need the class anatomical_entity seems to overlap with cellular component. Anything that is a cellular component would also seem to be and anatomical_entity however, this does not reason as such.

    2009-08-19 11:15:59 UTC in OBI

  • realizes

    The natural language definition, the domain and range and the use of the realizes relation do not match. This needs to be addressed for the 1.0 release.

    2009-08-01 07:57:29 UTC in OBI

  • Comment: vector role (cloning and disease)

    The point is that there should not be cloning vector role and biological role anywhere in the ontology, and we require an additional relation that actualy states what is is a vector for - what material entity is the vector transfering - so no not resolved yet. :) I can just go ahead and fix this.

    2009-07-29 14:07:49 UTC in OBI

  • Cellular_component

    The imported GO term cellular_component shouls be remove from the ontology. The definition does not fit with the BFO definition of material.

    2009-07-22 08:58:16 UTC in OBI

  • Comment: Should scattered_molecular_aggregate be a defined class?

    ok, so I assumed water would be a scattered_molecular_aggregate. However from the last bit of the defintion "..part of a more massive material entity that has parts that are other such aggregates." water could not be defined like this, as it has only (assuming pure) an aggregate of H20 molecules, not "other aggregates". Is this the intention?.

    2009-07-21 13:01:46 UTC in OBI

  • Comment: Should scattered_molecular_aggregate be a defined class?

    well, initially it was more of a question. Do you see classes being asserted underneath it? For example would blood serum, eluate, cell supernatant, chemical solution all not be scattered_moleculat_aggregates?.

    2009-07-21 08:46:15 UTC in OBI

  • Comment: Fragment derived from protein

    If you still have a need to state this, should it not at least have the derives_from relation? maybe a better label would be peptide_derived_from_protein or more generically, material_derived_from protein. This probably should be a defined of those peptide (entities) that have been derived from a protein by some process.

    2009-07-21 08:39:32 UTC in OBI

About Me

  • 2006-01-18 (4 years ago)
  • 1430184
  • fgibson_sf (My Site)
  • Frank Gibson

Send me a message