-
I know that under the ASL, others would not be required to contribute back. And that under the LGPL, we have been successful in compelling (yes, compelling) people who were shipping modified binaries to provide the modifications back.
The 90% IT thing is not really a significant consideration. Those who modify and don't contribute aren't going to change course based on the license. The...
2009-08-19 17:06:10 UTC in Trove for Java
-
Guys,
Same answer as before. We use the LGPL so that people can't improve trove and not share their improvements back with us. We have gotten several helpful enhancements because of this license requirement, so this is not merely philosophical posturing.
You'll see that the ASF is opposed to dual-licensing too, so this really isn't a reducible problem...
2009-08-19 15:38:00 UTC in Trove for Java
-
ericdf committed patchset 159 of module trove to the Trove for Java CVS repository, changing 3 files.
2007-08-04 18:55:49 UTC in Trove for Java
-
ericdf committed patchset 158 of module trove to the Trove for Java CVS repository, changing 1 files.
2007-08-04 17:30:25 UTC in Trove for Java
-
ericdf committed patchset 99 of module trove to the Trove for Java CVS repository, changing 1 files.
2005-12-27 21:50:20 UTC in Trove for Java
-
ericdf committed patchset 98 of module trove to the Trove for Java CVS repository, changing 9 files.
2005-12-27 21:46:06 UTC in Trove for Java
-
ericdf committed patchset 97 of module trove to the Trove for Java CVS repository, changing 3 files.
2005-12-27 21:32:04 UTC in Trove for Java
-
ericdf committed patchset 96 of module trove to the Trove for Java CVS repository, changing 2 files.
2005-12-27 19:14:28 UTC in Trove for Java
-
ericdf committed patchset 95 of module trove to the Trove for Java CVS repository, changing 2 files.
2005-12-27 19:13:16 UTC in Trove for Java
-
ericdf committed patchset 13 of module trove_web to the Trove for Java CVS repository, changing 1 files.
2005-03-26 18:26:53 UTC in Trove for Java
