David Trott

Show:

What's happening?

  • Followup: RE: Umount

    Fuse does have a fuse_umount call however it is not exposed in the Java API. The naive code could be updated, but I am unsure if additional work would be required to change from the existing fuse_main call to use the lower level calls like fuse_mount. An alternative strategy would be to do a system call to fusermount or umount (depending on your OS and permissions).

    2009-08-07 16:54:42 UTC in FUSE-J

  • Comment: "GCJ 4.0 bug workarround" causes crash in high concurreny

    Do you think that that is a JVM bug? Is it also worth logging a bug against the JVM?.

    2009-07-31 06:47:24 UTC in FUSE-J

  • Followup: RE: Read implementation

    You shouldn't need to maintain your own offset with fuse, since each call passes the offset to read. Simply seek to the offset and read buf.capacity() bytes of data. Note: Theoretically you should use remaining() rather than capacity() however the native creates a new buffer every time so it would only be an issue if the native implementation changed. Also each read operation should...

    2009-07-31 05:59:05 UTC in FUSE-J

About Me

  • 2008-11-02 (1 year ago)
  • 2271791
  • dtrott (My Site)
  • David Trott

Send me a message