David M. Zendzian

Show:

What's happening?

  • Followup: RE: IRC Channel of fwbuilder available?

    Sorry, i'm too use to it being called openprojects; it's freenode :)

    2009-11-05 14:29:09 UTC in Firewall Builder

  • Followup: RE: IRC Channel of fwbuilder available?

    I just started a #fwbuilder-users channel on openprojects irc. I'm not a fwbuilder dev or admin, but I do use it often and if we can get others to lurk on the channel we may have a decent place to bounce questions off other fwbuilder users (hence the -users) :) Be sure to continue to post issues/problems/questions to the forums as that is the real place to get solid answers from the dev team.

    2009-11-05 14:26:06 UTC in Firewall Builder

  • Followup: RE: Testing FWBuilder 3.1 - script errors

    So the issue is that /bin/sh can not handle an empty function. Even if the code is not "good" it needs to have something (which is why I added simple echo command). The reason it had problems for me is that I manually load modules & interfaces are configured by cluster sw; so those functions were not activated in fwbuilder & therefore empty. I only patched the skeleton scripts that I used...

    2009-11-05 14:17:45 UTC in Firewall Builder

  • Followup: RE: Testing FWBuilder 3.1 - script errors

    OK I found that if I patched the script skeleton and put simple echo statement in the empty functions it would run fine. dmz@ralfthewise:~/src/fwbuilder/1678/fwbuilder-3.1.0/src$ diff res/configlets/sveasoft/script_skeleton /tmp/script_skeleton 16a17 > echo "Loading Modules" 19a21 > echo "Verifying Interfaces" 38a41 > echo "Configuring Interfaces" 46a50 > echo "IP...

    2009-11-05 14:11:56 UTC in Firewall Builder

  • Testing FWBuilder 3.1 - script errors

    I was just testing fwbuilder 3.1 and the generated fw script had the following error: 236: Syntax error: "}" unexpected I have 14 firewalls and it is the same error on all of them. After doing some debugging it seems that sh doesn't like empty functions. For example: load_modules() { #Loading Modules } verify_interfaces() { #Verifying Interfaces } Gives errors...

    2009-11-05 13:55:33 UTC in Firewall Builder

  • Followup: RE: FWBuilder 3.1 cluster sw

    Ahh, that's cool.

    2009-11-04 15:47:28 UTC in Firewall Builder

  • FWBuilder 3.1 cluster sw

    I just started checking out 3.1 and was curious about the session tracking & clustering features required for the operating system. For the clustering, should we use heartbeat, pacemaker or keepalived? Or is it up to us? I noticed all of the session details in the cluster config; does that manage the conntrackd config (& cluster sw config) or is that all separate and up to us to...

    2009-11-03 21:32:51 UTC in Firewall Builder

  • Followup: RE: FWBuilder 3.1 rules

    so the order of loading / interpreting the rules is the fw object rules then it goes through the cluster rules? which one should have final "deny".

    2009-11-03 21:12:38 UTC in Firewall Builder

  • FWBuilder 3.1 rules

    I was just looking at the daily release of 3.1 and I am quite impressed with where things are going. One question, I was using fwbuilder 3.0 with a chain rule for my cluster config and specific rules for access into each specific firewall. I assume I can still have rules on the individual firewalls on 3.1; but how do the rules get created? Like now my rules are built for the fw then have...

    2009-11-02 19:20:49 UTC in Firewall Builder

  • Followup: RE: Problems with nat destination translation

    Doh, it's always right after you post something that you realize your typo. I had a typo in my protocol definition. ignore prior posting... btw fwbuilder rocks! Its better than many large scale tools i've used in the past.

    2009-06-07 14:25:38 UTC in Firewall Builder

About Me

  • 2000-01-11 (10 years ago)
  • 5646
  • dmz (My Site)
  • David M. Zendzian

Send me a message