-
Did anyone else get a ping from a corporate headhunter referencing MegaMek lately? I received an email from D. E. Shaw Group saying how awesome I am and how I should send my resume to them so I can become a Wall Street analyst. Then they ask if I know any other qualified people who may be interested. So if you did not get this email and you want to move to NYC, let me know and I can forward...
2007-06-19 06:08:43 UTC in MegaMek
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=496741
Beamer said "launched... in the Targeting Phase"
and "resolved in the off-board phase... of the same turn."
This is not possible per the rules--regardless of line of sight or
anything like that. If this can happen, it is still a valid bug.
2004-08-30 19:07:23 UTC in MegaMek
-
BACK OFF! I know Rocky Mountain BASIC, and I *will* use it!
D.
2004-08-18 05:07:43 UTC in MegaMek
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=496741
>I believe the current behavior matches the way
>the rule is written.
Relying on what beer has said about the current behavior, I
agree with you.
>Until the rule gets "clarified", I believe the correct behavior
>for MegaMek is to implement the rule as written;
My believe is close. I believe the correct developer behavior
is to direct resources...
2004-08-18 05:04:17 UTC in MegaMek
-
>- Is the skidding rule an exception to the "cannot
>move onto the top" rule?
I am going to go with "can 'o worms." It *looks* like it is an exception that may be "subject to change by executive interpretation." GenCon is this week. How about waiting on any changes until late next week?
>- If so, and a Tank ends up on top of a Building, is...
2004-08-17 20:07:46 UTC in MegaMek
-
Well, we do not *all* use Ant. Those damn things keep eating my jelly beans.
2004-08-17 19:58:10 UTC in MegaMek
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=496741
You are correct. "This used to work." Was this in the
weapon attack phase? Do you have the serverlog for the
game?
D.
2004-08-17 19:56:12 UTC in MegaMek
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=496741
Erm..., I find the matter to be *very* much a matter of
interpretation. At best, this is low priority. At worst,
the "cannot have LOS" restriction may be removed in the
future. It is my personal belief that the writers' basically did
a typo and they really mean "you can fire indirectly, and you
may want to do so when."
Basically, I am saying "why...
2004-08-17 19:41:54 UTC in MegaMek
-
Logged In: YES
user_id=496741
I do not feel that megamek.net is the appropriate place for
this type of technical discussion, Suv. I, for one, do not go
there any longer. How about the general forum here?
I have plenty to say, but I will wiat to see where the
conversaiton goes.
2004-08-13 15:40:00 UTC in MegaMek
-
If you like the fiction, go to BattleCorps to inquire about a membership.
http://www.battlecorps.com
/end_spam
D.
2004-08-03 23:40:44 UTC in MegaMek
