Daniel Parker

Show:

What's happening?

  • Followup: RE: external manipulation

    Apologies, support has fallen a little bit behind, it'll pick up again in the new year. You can do this by accumulating the SAX events in a SAX filter, and then constructing a document when receiving the outermost endElement event, keeping track of the nesting level, modifying the document, and then regenerating SAX events and feeding them into the content handler. This is a technique...

    2009-12-22 15:56:45 UTC in ServingXML

  • Followup: RE: Record Type in a diferent Record

    Can you send me a sample, to the Inquiry link on the home page? Thanks, Daniel.

    2009-12-21 14:56:39 UTC in ServingXML

  • Followup: RE: sx:repeatingGroup attr sub. expressions?

    Sorry for the delay, the implementation for start was easy, but I don't have any existing examples that use width for repeating groups, would you be able to provide one? If you can, please send one to the inquiry link on the home page. I would like to see exactly how you're using both count and width. Thanks, Daniel.

    2009-12-21 14:54:00 UTC in ServingXML

  • Followup: RE: Cobol signed numeric fields

    juvepo, If you could just send me the test cases (a table listing input and expected output) _before_ I upload the software, that would be appreciated, I mean, I can do this myself, but you're the one asking for the change, and this way you can select cases that cover off your requirements. Thanks, Daniel.

    2009-12-21 14:50:02 UTC in ServingXML

  • Followup: RE: sx:repeatingGroup attr sub. expressions?

    Without the requirement for addition/offsets, it shouldn't be too long -- Daniel.

    2009-12-10 15:35:37 UTC in ServingXML

  • Followup: RE: Cobol signed numeric fields

    It's being tested, shouldn't be too long. It would be helpful if you could contribute some additonal test cases, with a table of four columns - overpunch value, field width, decimal places, expected value, and say 20 or more rows. They'll be added to the test suite. -- Daniel.

    2009-12-10 15:33:42 UTC in ServingXML

  • Followup: RE: sx:repeatingGroup attr sub. expressions?

    Hello Graham, This forum is fine, it's a support issue, sorry for the late response. Supporting substitution expressions for start is easy, and adding width should be straight forward, but substitution expressions don't currently support addition or substraction of offsets. I could look into adding that, but it would take a couple to weeks before I get it out. -- Daniel.

    2009-12-07 05:17:56 UTC in ServingXML

  • Followup: RE: Cobol signed numeric fields

    sx:overpunchField doesn't currently support implied decimal places, I'll upload a patch for that later this week, and include some more description and examples in the element reference entry. "servingxml-framework/testsuite/elements" refers to a subdirectory under the downloaded ServingXML distribution -- Daniel.

    2009-12-01 21:33:47 UTC in ServingXML

  • Followup: RE: Cobol signed numeric fields

    There's not much documentation, I'm afraid, but this is supported with the sx:overpunchField element. Refer to the element reference, also search this forum for "overpunch". You can also find a small example in the overpunchField.xml test script, for a value ending with "A", look under servingxml-framework/testsuite/elements. -- Daniel.

    2009-12-01 04:59:07 UTC in ServingXML

  • Followup: RE: Record Type in a diferent Record

    I believe you can do this, by following the flat-to-XML example, "Aggregating Multiple Physical Records into a Composite Record (Record Composition) ." R0 and R1 would form a composite record, and the R1s could be different. If you get stuck, send me an example, taking it as far as you can, and I'll finish it off. -- Daniel.

    2009-12-01 04:43:50 UTC in ServingXML

About Me

  • 2001-05-14 (9 years ago)
  • 218806
  • danielaparker (My Site)
  • Daniel Parker

Send me a message