Craig Silverstein

Show:

What's happening?

  • Comment: TCMallocGuard is not dynamicaly linked

    I tried linking in a simple application (tcmalloc_unittest), with both tcmalloc.so and tcmalloc_minimal.so, and it ran ok. So it looks like whatever the problem was, we fixed in with the perftools 0.90 release (at http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools). If you find that there's still a problem with the latest release, feel free to re-open the issue on the Google code site...

    2007-04-17 00:17:05 UTC in google-perftools

  • Comment: libtcmalloc + mysql

    Unfortunately, LD_PRELOAD is a bit of a hack, and we can't guarantee it will work properly for all applications. In fact, I'm not sure exactly what effect the LD_PRELOAD has, and it may be very dependent on details of a particular setup. We've released a new version of google perftools -- perftools 0.90 -- at our new project location: http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools. It has many...

    2007-04-16 21:33:25 UTC in google-perftools

  • Comment: Function HeapProfilerStart is not fully thread-safe

    We've just released a new version of google-perftools -- perftools 0.90 -- at the new project location, http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools. This code has many bug-fixes and improvements, and I believe it fixes the problem above. If not, please feel free to re-open this bug at our new location, http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues.

    2007-04-16 21:31:28 UTC in google-perftools

  • Comment: make check still fails with Fedora rawhide

    We've just released perftools 0.90 on http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools. It has much improved 64-bit support, and many other improvements and fixes. I believe it will fix the problems here. If not, please feel free to reopen a bug at Google Code: http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues.

    2007-04-16 21:16:55 UTC in google-perftools

  • Comment: Google perftool not compiling in 64 bit linux machine

    We've just released perftools 0.90 on http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools. It has much improved 64-bit support, and many other improvements and fixes. I believe it will fix the problems here. If not, please feel free to reopen a bug at Google Code: http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues.

    2007-04-16 21:16:22 UTC in google-perftools

  • Comment: patch to build v0.4 with msvc2005

    Closing this patch; I've moved it to code.google.com/p/google-ctemplate, where all future development will take place.

    2007-01-26 01:09:17 UTC in google-ctemplate

  • Comment: cross-platform filepath stuff

    Closing this patch, because I've moved it over to code.google.com/p/google-ctemplate, where all future development is happening.

    2007-01-26 01:06:00 UTC in google-ctemplate

  • Comment: cross-platform threads-stuff

    Closing; development has moved to code.google.com/p/google-ctemplate. I've moved this patch there.

    2007-01-26 01:03:40 UTC in google-ctemplate

  • Comment: cross-compiler hash-stuff

    Closing here; all development has moved over to code.google.com/p/google-ctemplate.

    2007-01-26 01:01:57 UTC in google-ctemplate

  • Comment: remove g++ extension from UrlQueryEscape

    Dangerous not only because it's a gcc extension, but also because it could cause a stack overflow. A similar fix to this patch has been applied for the next release.

    2007-01-25 23:59:36 UTC in google-ctemplate

About Me

  • 2005-03-14 (5 years ago)
  • 1239124
  • csilvers (My Site)
  • Craig Silverstein

Send me a message