Share

Emonic

Tracker: Feature Requests

5 Codecompletion more detailed - ID: 1813829
Last Update: Comment added ( rcjsuen )

When one uses code completion via the emonicinformator, he is not informed
if the members/properties etc. are public/private/protected.
It would be helpful, if the access modifier are presented additionally to
allow an intended usage of the items.


Dominik Ertl ( ertl ) - 2007-10-15 13:30

5

Closed

None

Nobody/Anonymous

None

0.4

Public


Comments ( 12 )

Date: 2007-10-29 12:08
Sender: rcjsuen


You should be manually updating the changelog.html file in the
emonichomepage CVS module whenever you implement a new feature or fix a
bug.


Date: 2007-10-29 07:52
Sender: ertl


Seems to be one has done this for me:) Question: Updating the html-file
should occur with the apache forrester, doesnt it? Or is manually editing
allowed, to?


Date: 2007-10-26 14:27
Sender: rcjsuen


Dominik, please update the change log file in the emonichomepage module
for this feature request.


Date: 2007-10-25 14:09
Sender: rcjsuen


Dominik, it is looking a lot better than before now. :) We still have a
long way to go but the changes you've made are a considerable improvement
to what we originally had, thanks!


Date: 2007-10-25 12:37
Sender: ertl


Added changes to the cvs. Please try if it fits your needs (for static and
non-static elements). Remy, your suggestions are integrated as well.


Date: 2007-10-23 15:05
Sender: rcjsuen


Could we also not show the access type? The image in the completion
proposal should be self-explanatory.


Date: 2007-10-23 14:55
Sender: ertl


For external dll-types (e.g. System.xxx), there are (as Remy said) no
access identifiers and values shown. Additionally, the pictures are always
showing private access, which is an erroneus presentation. Both
malfunctions suffer from a "null" entry within the CodeElement attribute
access identifier. I am working on it...


Date: 2007-10-23 14:34
Sender: ertl


Added images to existing code completion. Missing information still an
issue.


Date: 2007-10-22 18:39
Sender: rcjsuen


I think it is a good start but still feel that images should be used to
indicate the visibility of the methods like what we do in the Outline view
and like what JDT does. Also, there is no information offered about methods
extracted from DLLs.

However, let's just leave it be for now and tackle it after we release
0.3.


Date: 2007-10-22 18:05
Sender: ertl


Added information within the completion window. Now, the completion
proposal is structured like the following: <completion.name> :
<access-modifier> <type>; included in cvs (sorry Bernhard, it has been
finished before 0.3 is released)

Plz try (should work for static and non-static members/fields)


Date: 2007-10-16 05:58
Sender: bernhardbremProject Admin


To be implemented after publishing the 0.3-release


Date: 2007-10-16 03:01
Sender: rcjsuen


Having an image set for the completion proposals would be a good start I
think.


Attached File

No Files Currently Attached

Changes ( 8 )

Field Old Value Date By
status_id Open 2007-10-25 14:16 ertl
close_date - 2007-10-25 14:16 ertl
status_id Pending 2007-10-23 14:55 ertl
close_date 2007-10-23 14:34 2007-10-23 14:55 ertl
status_id Open 2007-10-23 14:34 ertl
close_date - 2007-10-23 14:34 ertl
artifact_group_id To do later 2007-10-23 06:03 bernhardbrem
artifact_group_id None 2007-10-18 07:20 bernhardbrem