Fink

Tracker: Package Submissions

5 aspell-ru - ID: 1281960

Last Update: Comment added ( danielg4 )

Details:

Tested with the 10.3 tree, but should work with 10.4 also.
For the 'text' section.
'fink validate' with High verbosity passes on both .info and .deb

Yet another dictionary for aspell.

Submitted:

Daniel Gimpelevich ( danielg4 ) - 2005-09-05 08:23

Priority:

Status:

Closed

Resolution:

Accepted

Assigned:

Mich�le Garoche

Category:

None

Group:

Added to Fink

Visibility:

Public

Comments ( 12 )

Date: 2006-10-02 01:02 Sender: danielg4 Logged In: YES user_id=877198 I have not examined the differences between the old dictionary and the new one, but AIUI, the new one is intended to supersede the old. If so, you would be in a better position than I to repackage it, which would not require actually examining its contents.
Date: 2006-10-02 00:39 Sender: michga Logged In: YES user_id=552580 As you want, I took it only to put it in Fink, but I'm not a native Russian speaker, so if you want to maintain it, I'll change the maintainer. For example, there is a pending new aspell package. The old Russian dictionary works with it, but there is also a new Russian dictionary made for this new version of aspell. I'm unable to decide if the new one is better or not. You may be able to decide it better.
Date: 2006-10-01 21:04 Sender: danielg4 Logged In: YES user_id=877198 If you would like to maintain it, then the maintainer should be you, IMHO.
Date: 2006-10-01 20:57 Sender: michga Logged In: YES user_id=552580 Thanks dmacks, now it's clearer. Should I change also the maintainer? Because as the submitter did not put his name as requested I put mine.
Date: 2006-10-01 15:53 Sender: dmacks Logged In: YES user_id=535292 Miga: you handled committing it, so it gets assigned to you. The package was used essentially as it was, so this tracker item submission itself is "Accepted" and "Added to Fink".
Date: 2006-09-30 22:45 Sender: michga Logged In: YES user_id=552580 Not exactly since the revision number was not right in the supplied info file. Could we consider this tracker is closed now?
Date: 2006-09-30 22:34 Sender: danielg4 Logged In: YES user_id=877198 Resolution should probably be "Accepted" as well...
Date: 2006-09-30 22:23 Sender: michga Logged In: YES user_id=552580 You're probably right. It's the first time I use this, so I don't know exactly how to deal with this, when the file has been added since a long time.
Date: 2006-09-30 22:04 Sender: danielg4 Logged In: YES user_id=877198 This may be nitpicking, but shouldn't the Group be "Added to Fink" rather than "Rejected (Already in Fink)" since it was only added after I submitted it?
Date: 2006-02-27 10:45 Sender: michga Logged In: YES user_id=552580 Added in fink all branches, all trees with correct revision number.
Date: 2005-11-04 22:52 Sender: dmacks Logged In: YES user_id=535292 Revision starts at 1, not 0.
Date: 2005-11-04 22:51 Sender: dmacks Logged In: YES user_id=535292 Looks good. If you're submitting this, you should list yourself as the maintainer.

Attached File ( 1 )

Filename	Description	Download
aspell-ru.info		Download

Changes ( 9 )

Field	Old Value	Date	By
resolution_id	Rejected	2006-10-01 15:53	dmacks
assigned_to	nobody	2006-10-01 15:53	dmacks
artifact_group_id	Rejected (Already in Fink)	2006-09-30 22:23	michga
close_date	-	2006-09-30 21:58	michga
artifact_group_id	Awaiting Update from Submitter	2006-09-30 21:58	michga
status_id	Open	2006-09-30 21:58	michga
resolution_id	None	2006-09-30 21:58	michga
artifact_group_id	Undergoing Validation	2005-11-04 22:51	dmacks
File Added	148086: aspell-ru.info	2005-09-05 08:23	danielg4

Fink

Tracker: Package Submissions

Comments ( 12 )

Attached File ( 1 )

Changes ( 9 )

About SourceForge

Find Software

Develop Software

Community

Help