Tracker: Package Submissions

5 aspell-ru - ID: 1281960
Last Update: Comment added ( danielg4 )

Tested with the 10.3 tree, but should work with 10.4 also.
For the 'text' section.
'fink validate' with High verbosity passes on both .info and .deb

Yet another dictionary for aspell.


Daniel Gimpelevich ( danielg4 ) - 2005-09-05 08:23

5

Closed

Accepted

Mich�le Garoche

None

Added to Fink

Public


Comments ( 12 )

Date: 2006-10-02 01:02
Sender: danielg4

Logged In: YES
user_id=877198

I have not examined the differences between the old dictionary and the new

one, but AIUI, the new one is intended to supersede the old. If so, you
would
be in a better position than I to repackage it, which would not require
actually
examining its contents.


Date: 2006-10-02 00:39
Sender: michga

Logged In: YES
user_id=552580

As you want, I took it only to put it in Fink, but I'm not a native
Russian speaker,
so if you want to maintain it, I'll change the maintainer.

For example, there is a pending new aspell package. The old Russian
dictionary
works with it, but there is also a new Russian dictionary made for this
new
version of aspell. I'm unable to decide if the new one is better or not.
You may
be able to decide it better.



Date: 2006-10-01 21:04
Sender: danielg4

Logged In: YES
user_id=877198

If you would like to maintain it, then the maintainer should be you, IMHO.


Date: 2006-10-01 20:57
Sender: michga

Logged In: YES
user_id=552580

Thanks dmacks, now it's clearer.
Should I change also the maintainer?
Because as the submitter did not put his name as requested I put mine.



Date: 2006-10-01 15:53
Sender: dmacksSourceForge.net Subscriber and DonorProject Admin

Logged In: YES
user_id=535292

Miga: you handled committing it, so it gets assigned to you.
The package was used essentially as it was, so this tracker
item submission itself is "Accepted" and "Added to Fink".


Date: 2006-09-30 22:45
Sender: michga

Logged In: YES
user_id=552580

Not exactly since the revision number was not right in the supplied info
file.
Could we consider this tracker is closed now?


Date: 2006-09-30 22:34
Sender: danielg4

Logged In: YES
user_id=877198

Resolution should probably be "Accepted" as well...


Date: 2006-09-30 22:23
Sender: michga

Logged In: YES
user_id=552580

You're probably right. It's the first time I use this, so I don't know
exactly how to
deal with this, when the file has been added since a long time.



Date: 2006-09-30 22:04
Sender: danielg4

Logged In: YES
user_id=877198

This may be nitpicking, but shouldn't the Group be "Added to Fink" rather

than "Rejected (Already in Fink)" since it was only added after I
submitted it?


Date: 2006-02-27 10:45
Sender: michga

Logged In: YES
user_id=552580

Added in fink all branches, all trees with correct revision number.


Date: 2005-11-04 22:52
Sender: dmacksSourceForge.net Subscriber and DonorProject Admin

Logged In: YES
user_id=535292

Revision starts at 1, not 0.


Date: 2005-11-04 22:51
Sender: dmacksSourceForge.net Subscriber and DonorProject Admin

Logged In: YES
user_id=535292

Looks good. If you're submitting this, you should list yourself as the
maintainer.


Attached File ( 1 )

Filename Description Download
aspell-ru.info Download

Changes ( 9 )

Field Old Value Date By
resolution_id Rejected 2006-10-01 15:53 dmacks
assigned_to nobody 2006-10-01 15:53 dmacks
artifact_group_id Rejected (Already in Fink) 2006-09-30 22:23 michga
close_date - 2006-09-30 21:58 michga
artifact_group_id Awaiting Update from Submitter 2006-09-30 21:58 michga
status_id Open 2006-09-30 21:58 michga
resolution_id None 2006-09-30 21:58 michga
artifact_group_id Undergoing Validation 2005-11-04 22:51 dmacks
File Added 148086: aspell-ru.info 2005-09-05 08:23 danielg4