This initially exhibited itself in the report on...
[ 1212377 ] URIException in (de)serialization, post
CrawlURI slimming
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1212377&group_id=7
3833&atid=539099
...but can be independently reproduced as a problem in
the way UURI deals with inconsistently-escaped URIs.
Specifically, try...
UURIFactory.getInstance("http://www.example.com/test%20path?foo=bar%").getU
RI();
... which causes a URIException only on the getURI(), or...
UURIFactory.getInstance("http://www.example.com/test%20path%");
...which causes a URIException on instance-creation.
That's a little better, in that it doesn't give you a
broken UURI instance, but ideally, we should tolerate
and recover a usable URI from this half-escapedness,
because browsers do.
The fix might include changing the
UURIFactory.isEscaped() test somehow, and/or improving
the UURIFactor.fixup() method.
Karl Thiessen
None
1.6.0
Public
|
Date: 2007-03-14 00:53
|
|
Date: 2005-08-09 00:52 Logged In: YES |
|
Date: 2005-07-12 01:18 Logged In: YES |
|
Date: 2005-06-02 20:28 Logged In: YES |
| Field | Old Value | Date | By |
|---|---|---|---|
| close_date | - | 2005-12-02 17:14 | stack-sf |
| status_id | Open | 2005-12-02 17:14 | stack-sf |
| artifact_group_id | None | 2005-09-23 18:29 | gojomo |
| assigned_to | gojomo | 2005-08-09 00:52 | gojomo |
| priority | 6 | 2005-08-03 01:16 | gojomo |
| assigned_to | karl-ia | 2005-07-12 01:18 | karl-ia |
| assigned_to | nobody | 2005-06-02 20:28 | gojomo |
Copyright © 2010 Geeknet, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use