Once a large crawl has been under way for awhile, I
inevitably need to drop in some new filters to
eliminate some junk. These URIs all wind up with a -500X.
If I'm using a budgeted hold queues, this means that
all the -500Xs will be counted against the queue,
slowing its process. -500X take very little time to
process after all and the queue is quickly made
inactive. Other queues however still take their usual
amount of time. Basically it temporarily starves (or at
least limits) the queue. Additionally if a queue has a
max total budget, do we really want these to count
against it (probably no negative value URIs should).
-9998 maybe should also be free? In fact I'm wondering
if all negative codes shouldn't be free and only ACTUAL
crawling be counted against the queues budget.
Gordon Mohr
Frontier
1.6.0
Public
|
Date: 2007-03-14 00:53
|
|
Date: 2005-07-22 02:50 Logged In: YES |
| Field | Old Value | Date | By |
|---|---|---|---|
| artifact_group_id | None | 2005-09-23 18:02 | gojomo |
| summary | Failed URIs should be 'free' | 2005-08-09 17:35 | gojomo |
| close_date | - | 2005-07-22 02:50 | gojomo |
| resolution_id | None | 2005-07-22 02:50 | gojomo |
| status_id | Open | 2005-07-22 02:50 | gojomo |
| priority | 5 | 2005-06-22 18:59 | gojomo |
| assigned_to | nobody | 2005-06-22 18:59 | gojomo |
Copyright © 2010 Geeknet, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use