Tracker: Bugs

5 (SubcollectionOfWithRelationToTypeFn Event highlyRelevantInE - ID: 673897
Last Update: Comment added ( dietrichfischer )

(SubcollectionOfWithRelationToTypeFn Event
highlyRelevantInEvent :BASE-WORD-DENOT)

What is this?

Cf. :

Formula Diagnosis

Mt : BaseKB
Formula :
(termOfUnit
(SubcollectionOfWithRelationToTypeFn Event
highlyRelevantInEvent XXX)
(SubcollectionOfWithRelationToTypeFn Event
highlyRelevantInEvent ZZZ))

Diagnosis : OK

Note: XXX and ZZZ do not have got the prefix #$, just
anything written.


Nobody/Anonymous ( nobody ) - 2003-01-24 01:35:01 PST

5

Open

None

Nobody/Anonymous

KB Content

None

Public


Comments ( 6 )

Date: 2003-10-29 06:35:13 PST
Sender: dietrichfischer

Logged In: YES
user_id=564384

PS
Sorry, the formula does pass the check for wellformedness.
That which I found in the function extent as well as my
nonsense test formula.


Date: 2003-10-29 02:54:44 PST
Sender: dietrichfischer

Logged In: YES
user_id=564384

Hi JHeadly,
I suggest that you misunderstood my note:
If you inspect in the current version's virgin image the
function extent of
SubcollectionOfWithRelationToTypeFn
you find the following statement:

(termOfUnit (SubcollectionOfWithRelationToTypeFn Event
highlyRelevantInEvent :BASE-WORD-DENOT)
(SubcollectionOfWithRelationToTypeFn Event
highlyRelevantInEvent :BASE-WORD-DENOT))

I simply ask, what does this mean
...and give an example
where a syntactically similar formula does not pass the check
for wellformedness.

Regards
Dietrich


Date: 2003-10-28 13:01:04 PST
Sender: jheadley

Logged In: YES
user_id=522978

About your Note, I believe that variables can be upper or
lower case, can be numbers and/or letters, and can start
with ? or not.

I think that the canonical way of representing variables in
CycL formulae is to use all upper-case, preceded by a ?
(question mark).

The formula fails with #$XXX and #$ZZZ (having the #$
prefix) -- I would think that this is non-wff because XXX and
ZZZ are not constants in OpenCyc.


Date: 2003-10-28 11:16:04 PST
Sender: jheadley

Logged In: YES
user_id=522978

About your Note, I believe that variables can be upper or
lower case, can be numbers and/or letters, and can start
with ? or not.

I think that the canonical way of representing variables in
CycL formulae is to use all upper-case, preceded by a ?
(question mark).

The formula fails with #$XXX and #$ZZZ (having the #$
prefix) -- I would think that this is non-wff because XXX and
ZZZ are not constants in OpenCyc.


Date: 2003-10-28 11:14:22 PST
Sender: jheadley

Logged In: YES
user_id=522978

About your Note, I believe that variables can be upper or
lower case, can be numbers and/or letters, and can start
with ? or not.

I think that the canonical way of representing variables in
CycL formulae is to use all upper-case, preceded by a ?
(question mark).

The formula fails with #$XXX and #$ZZZ (having the #$
prefix) -- I would think that this is non-wff because XXX and
ZZZ are not constants in OpenCyc.


Date: 2003-01-24 01:40:14 PST
Sender: dietrichfischer

Logged In: YES
user_id=564384

Sorry, submiiting bugs is possibible without being logged in:
Nobody in this case was dietrichfischer


Attached File

No Files Currently Attached

Change

No changes have been made to this artifact.