User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
24
0
0
0
0
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
Write a Review

User Reviews

  • macxfadz
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Good Wrapper for Win32

    Posted 09/04/2014
  • metalgearcreamy
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Nicely done!

    Posted 08/18/2014
  • shallyee
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Very good job, i really like it.

    Posted 08/02/2014
  • euvi
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    just great

    Posted 03/23/2014
  • gangbing
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    good job

    Posted 02/19/2014
  • elwoodnewman
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Nice, thank you

    Posted 06/26/2013
  • haccel
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    The best!!!

    Posted 03/16/2013
  • adriandavis
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Simple to use.

    Posted 02/17/2013
  • ianhayes
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    win32-framework is fast and easy to use

    Posted 01/20/2013
  • colefisher
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    very good program win32-framework.

    Posted 12/19/2012
  • cameronhansen
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    win32-framework works great

    Posted 11/13/2012
  • evanrivera
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Reliable and runs smoothly

    Posted 09/15/2012
  • samuelhenry
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    win32-framework works perfectly.

    Posted 03/26/2012
  • oid-3726811
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I compiled the 'Dock' sample project using Visual Studio 6 on Windows 7, it runs ok. But when I try to run it on Windows Server 2003 SP2, it generates a bunch of errors 'The procedure entry point ___CxxFrameHandler3 could not be located in the dynamic link library Msvcrt.dll' and the Window eventually appears correctly. Is this framework really backward compatible? Is it referencing to a newer version of msvcrt.dll?

    Posted 02/08/2012
  • oid-3321816
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Nice framework. I hope that the future release would have optional message mapping macros like those used in ATL and WTL GUI classes or other message and event handling mechanisms aside from using switch statements. Message mapping macros make the code more neat and easier to maintain than a big switch statement especially if there are lots of messages and events that needs to be handled. Big and sometimes nested switch statements tangle the code making maintenance quite difficult and this can be avoided with message mapping macros. Message and event handling methods used in other frameworks like QT and SmartWin++ are also good alternatives to large switch statements. So, I suggest that this framework should have optional message mapping macros or other message and event handling methods making it more suitable for large projects too.

    Posted 07/06/2011
  • sfsalvorhardin
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Great alternative to MFC because it builds 200KB executable instead of 2,000KB for simple MDI Frame based application with icons. Simpler Win32++ apps compile to under 100KB! Nice alternative to WTL for beginners because it builds with more C++ compilers, has nice docs bundled (chm file), and extensive examples that actually compile and run without effort. Hard to believe believe WTL's bundled example projects won't even build using Visual C++ 2008 SP1 Professional as of March 13, 2011. On the other hand, WTL's appwizard is rather nice and works well. Best of all, Win32++ seems to be updated and is constantly improving even though it has reached version 7.0. One missing feature in Win32++ is auto-hide docking panels like Visual Studio 2008 IDE which slide in/out of view. WTL has example projects doing this at CodeProject.com but I've not seen this for Win32++ yet.

    Posted 03/13/2011
  • bennbowen
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I LOVE THIS!

    Posted 03/04/2011
  • scanff
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Thanks for this project, it's sad developers use MFC or Managed code because the lack of Platform SDK documentation and examples. Maybe now they'll be able to write fast and small windows applications. No more hello world creating a 2MB binary :) Keep up the great work!

    Posted 12/16/2010
  • oid-2880129
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Very nice and serious work.

    Posted 08/29/2010
  • tomekg
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Replacement of complicated MFC. Very nice.Thank You david_nash.

    Posted 03/24/2010
  • mko32
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Very good, I where looking for something like this. Thank You. Marcel

    Posted 12/25/2009
  • cnhnyu
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    very good project

    Posted 12/10/2009
  • matrowang
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Good, thanks a lot.

    Posted 10/24/2009
  • ixix
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Very helpful

    Posted 09/18/2009