User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
4
0
0
0
0
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
Write a Review

User Reviews

  • jonahbishop
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    very easy to use

    Posted 02/18/2013
  • caydenharris
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Reliable and runs smoothly

    Posted 01/24/2013
  • ryanfong
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    good project webtest

    Posted 12/23/2012
  • guido_leenders
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    We have been using Canoo WebTest for over a year in our nightly smoke, running it from our main build.xml. It tests our web frontends, both for performance and compliance to standards. As a side effect, it captures each night the then current output of reports in PDF and Excel format and the webpages itself. These captures are used to daily update the manual with current screenshots. In general stable. With long running actions (thousands of web requests) sometimes after one, two or more hours a java.util.ConcurrentModificationException can be thrown from webtest source when calling org.apache.tools.ant.Project.getProperty, so keep your webtest small and/or --keep-going.

    Posted 01/21/2012