User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
59
1
0
0
4
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
Write a Review

User Reviews

  • diegoan
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    good parser which is very simple to integrate!

    Posted 07/24/2012
  • fritobpecde
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    nice and simple GUI, i like it a lot better.

    Posted 06/13/2012
  • ovobpasa
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    The best!!

    Posted 06/13/2012
  • arsaisano
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I take it everywhere I go :)

    Posted 06/07/2012
  • reitirata
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Very, very light program, and fully featured.

    Posted 06/06/2012
  • tooldatherti
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Software is great!

    Posted 06/06/2012
  • layquipledan
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I just love this program and use it for years now. Never had any problems with it. Highly recommended!

    Posted 06/06/2012
  • inenicduc
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    The best suite basen on free apps!

    Posted 06/06/2012
  • precfatada
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Just a great tool.

    Posted 06/06/2012
  • berstestveabthe
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    a great software,love it,very useful

    Posted 06/06/2012
  • imaporstim
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    the best, just works

    Posted 06/05/2012
  • titrighwirect
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Fast, easy-to-use, powerful... simply gets things done.

    Posted 06/04/2012
  • congworlniros
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Nice and very helpful! Thank you!

    Posted 06/02/2012
  • outcourjoyse
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Excellent piece of work.

    Posted 06/02/2012
  • dlauren
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    It's actually really fast unlike what other users say.

    Posted 05/28/2012
  • alexsalary
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Don't agree with Andreas. I think app is very fast. And have great realization in the code.

    Posted 05/20/2012
  • ethanrivera
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Works, very small, no complaints.

    Posted 03/23/2012
  • markthomas55
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Fantastic project.

    Posted 03/22/2012
  • talicamen
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Awesome job, thanks for your time for sharing

    Posted 03/04/2012
  • alexpeshkov
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    High actual program, I'm just checking in turn at the regular to watch out for changes.

    Posted 02/28/2012
  • kspes
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    useful and portable library! but I wouldn't use it for large and complex xml's though.

    Posted 02/26/2012
  • ventarion
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    The project idea is really good but personally I think you haven't done a very good job. To explain this attitude: The memory management is quite poor since you do not use any garbage collection or smart pointers. The main problem is that memory management can easily become confusing and very complex. Thus it is almost unavoidable to have memory leaks, segfaults, and so on. As a solution I would suggest the C++11 or boost shared pointers. Doing such a thing you would not emburden the application programmer with the task of doing the memory management even for the library. The heavy pointerwork needed to traverse a XML token graph is quite complex and confusing. Not only is it a lot of work for the programmer to simply traverse the parser graph but in combination with your memory management problem mentioned above also this is a source for many avoidable bugs and errors. The documentation could be a bit more explaining but is quite good in the whole. The library in general is, however, quite good and stable, so it most certainly is a quite useful tool.

    Posted 01/24/2012
  • lbx2615
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    easy use and stable, good job!

    Posted 01/10/2012
  • lakputcha
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Document says it support Character Entities. But it is not supporting < and skipping & Similar posts on this forum have not been replied since 2009!

    Posted 12/02/2011
  • oid-3063851
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Poor job because the docs say it removes the special chars but it does not and I have 2.6.1.

    Posted 09/20/2010
Show next 14 reviews