User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
5
1
0
0
0
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 2 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 1 / 5
Write a Review

User Reviews

  • hexafind
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    If you have trouble with ld, when making on Mac OS X : ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [all] Error 1 Try this post, it worked for me: aHR0cDovL3d3dy5xdWVzdGlvbi1kZWZlbnNlLmNvbS8yMDExLzA5LzAyL3NzbHNjYW4taW5zdGFsbC1lcnJvci1sZC1zeW1ib2xzLW5vdC1mb3VuZC1mb3ItYXJjaGl0ZWN0dXJlLXg4Nl82NC1pbnN0YWxsLXNzbHNjYW4tb24tb3N4LWxpb24= Please note, this site wraps text on words, so therefore you must copy both lines to get the FULL base64 url address. This is a Base64 Encoded URL, decode it to view the answer to your ld problems.

    Posted 08/28/2014
  • eerovolotinen
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    as redhat does not support elliptic curves in openssl, need to apply following patch to compile it on redhat systems: --- sslscan.c 2009-09-01 14:35:59.000000000 +0200 +++ sslscan-new.c 2013-09-13 10:15:51.311054350 +0200 @@ -985,6 +985,8 @@ fprintf(options->xmlOutput, " </pk>\n"); } break; +/* redhat does not support elliptic curves in openssl */ +#ifdef ENABLE_ELLIPTIC_CURVE case EVP_PKEY_EC: printf(" EC Public Key:\n"); if (options->xmlOutput != 0) @@ -996,6 +998,7 @@ fprintf(options->xmlOutput, " </pk>\n"); } break; +#endif default: printf(" Public Key: Unknown\n"); if (options->xmlOutput != 0)

    Posted 09/13/2013
  • necomuk
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    on openSUSE 12.2 you have to modify the Makefile: gcc -g -Wall -lcrypto -lssl -o sslscan $(SRCS) $(LDFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) # gcc -g -Wall -lssl -o sslscan $(SRCS) $(LDFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)

    Posted 02/21/2013
  • egandrew
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I get ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 for Mac OSX 10.7.5 with openssl 1.0.1c May 2012

    Posted 02/04/2013
  • colejackson
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    One of the easiest apps to use

    Posted 10/27/2012
  • williamhansen
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Easy to use and works.

    Posted 09/13/2012