Scribus Icon

Cross-platform page layout

User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
120
3
1
1
6
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 3 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 3 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 3 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 3 / 5
Write a Review

User Reviews

  • casperrosewater
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I have used Scribus 1.4.x for Windows (7-64) on a very powerful laptop fairly often for a technical book. The learning curve is moderate-to-difficult but any DTP software is very complex. It has quite a few inconsistencies and eccentricities. For one example, to change values, occasionally the spin arrow buttons might work but direct numerical entry into the value box may not work. These little things are sporadic but create minor annoyances. It requires greater patience than a commercial release. I had originally written here that Scribus 1.4.x crashed once or more per session (my sessions tend to be very long). After a recent crash the Win7 Action Center function reported that it had adjusted Scribus 1.4.4 to run in "Compatibility Mode." This was done automatically by Win7 and has reduced the crashes greatly to the point where I no longer worry as much but still save often. It was only after many, many dozens of crashes and quite a few 1.4 versions that Windows finally made this automatic adjustment. Others will want to experiment with "Compatibility Mode" to attempt to make this adjustment manually immediately after install. Another reviewer here complained that the panels (panel docking and collapsing) need serious re-engineering to become useful. I suspect that reviewer had not incorporated the use of "F" keys into his workflow. With a dual display setup I drag all panels to their own display. Then just press the panel's F key twice and the panel rises to the top so it works well enough on dual displays. My complaint is that once a panel is closed completely it does not remember the position I had previously assigned to it and I must reposition it every time it is newly reopened. Given that it's free it's just good enough for me to want to continue to use it, working through the occasional frustrations. Part of that is not wanting to spend for InDesign much less learn a new workflow, and knowing that Publisher is not nearly powerful enough. The development isn't perfect but will likely continue to improve. The official online user forum is good enough for finding answers. With all that said, if you have ample patience, you can make very beautiful and professional documents with Scribus. The majority of Scribus is sound and robust. It can do most anything that the commercial products do and a few things they cannot.

    Posted 06/30/2014
  • griffrog
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Scribus allows you to do exactly what it was intended to do. Since we aren't talking about word processors, I won't sit here and complain about Scribus not being just like any other publishing software I've used before. As for other design softwares, Scribus is better than all of them because it works and it's free. Thank you, developers, for the hard work you put into this FREE publishing software!

    Posted 06/03/2014
  • stevenoctavious
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    On the positive side, this wonderful project has huge potentials. Excellent results can be achieved by using this software. The results are easily comparable to commercially-available alternatives. On the negative side, I think the project is underpowered and needs more developers. The user-interface needs rethinking. Many of the great options and features cannot easily be used or are arranged in very confusing ways. It is not the lack of feature, but the way they are presented that is a big issue: disorganized, scattered, unmanageable, and confusing at times. Unfortunately, there is no easy fix for it either. I always wanted to switch to an open source alternative (from the most-commonly-used desktop publishing software application). I have never been able to do that with Scribus. One reason is that most of your skills on other software are not easily transferable to Scribus. The learning curve for Scribus, even if you have come from another desktop publishing application, is pretty steep and long; and unreasonably so. The panels need serious re-engineering to become useful. They cannot be ducked (as of version 1.4.4) which adds to the usability issue. They are not collapsible either, i.e you either have them opened, or closed. This makes using the panels extremely tedious and inefficient. The panels’ usability and the issues surrounding them is the single, most important usability issue with Scribus. The visual elements of the design of the software is stuck somewhere in 1990s and uses the mentality and design paradigms of that era. So it has a lot of room for improvement in this regards. The available themes do not help you fix the dated look of the design at all (they actually make it worse). Aside from the user interface and usability issues, the setting and preferences are reasonable. You can calibrate the units for measuring sizes based on the resolution of your monitor and it works great. Autosave, colour management, preflight verifications, and PDF export settings are available and different PDF standards are being added gradually (although very slowly). Scribus also allows you to use Python scripts (although I never tried it) and it uses a pluggable architecture (so there are a few plug-ins available for it). The plug-ins extend the features of Scribus. I certainly recommend this software to anyone who wants to have a reasonable alternative to the expensive commercial desktop publishing software applications. Once you passed the initial and painfully slow learning stage, you can be sure that you can create great results in this application, ready for publication at the highest level of quality and standard.

    Posted 05/09/2014
  • viattonbelksam
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Good tool

    Posted 07/29/2013
  • deniskomkin
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Good, but I can't say more.

    Posted 07/09/2013
  • davepp
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Very professional software that delivers very professional results. I use it for all my design and magazine work. Thanks for the hard work.

    Posted 07/03/2013
  • ryanhouse
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Scribus is wonderful! Thanks.

    Posted 06/07/2013
  • rusik1978
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Thanks for great project! Simply the best.Good,good,good.+1

    Posted 05/19/2013
  • sever78
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    very good project, thanks!Good,good,good.+1

    Posted 05/18/2013
  • urina
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    very good project, thanks!Good,good,good.+1

    Posted 05/17/2013
  • bettinaf1986
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Thanks ! Great!

    Posted 05/16/2013
  • ashleyvalentine
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Great product! Thanks

    Posted 05/16/2013
  • tfileme
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Thanks for Scribus, it's the best!

    Posted 05/14/2013
  • jantvrdy
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Scribus is a DTP package that really packs a punch. It's highly useable, even though it has a rather steep learning curve. The PDF documents you can create with it are of professional quality

    Posted 05/02/2013
  • shepherd1
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Best Quark alternative

    Posted 04/21/2013
  • alexvinn11
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    very good project, thanks!Good,good,good.+1

    Posted 04/15/2013
  • giavaro
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Assolutamente imparagonabile sia a QuarkXPress 9.5 che, a maggior ragione, ad Adobe Indesign 6.0 !!! Non si tratta di sapere o non sapere usare il computer (come dicono 'i sapientoni'_alias presuntuosi_del blog!),ma ha voluto fare ed integrare funzioni 'non semplici',ma,anzi ,'complesse',che non era il caso di im- plementare, 'per distinguersi' da Quark e Indesign,che,beninteso hanno un prezzo 'molto alto',ma sono dei Programmi di Desktop Publishing supervalidi e professionali. L'unico punto a favore per Scribus che è 'gra- tis' e proprio per ciò mi sembra che voglia fare 'troppo l'esibizionista', complicando eccessivamente fun- zioni e semplicità di utilizzazione ad ogni livello. Tuttavia grande lode agli sviluppatori ed al loro lavoro, peraltro encomiabile,beninteso! Si vede che chi si è abituato a Scribus lo ha fatto perchè non può permet- tersi di acquistare,giustamente,Quark e Indesign,ma dire che,solo perchè 'gratuito' sarebbe superiore,è un paradosso che deriva appunto dal poter usufruire di uno strumento che 'appaga perchè gratis' e non perchè ha le qualità che avrebbe rispetto ai rivali denigrati perchè costano una cifra!!! Qui sta tutta la verità o la realtà dei fatti e non altro. Almeno questo è il mio parere!

    Posted 04/13/2013
  • jimi78
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    very good project, thanks!

    Posted 04/09/2013
  • blaskrusik1978
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    very good project, thanks!

    Posted 04/05/2013
  • commshack
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Scribus doesn't like the architecture of my Mac. So I look for a version that will work and find no information whatever. I download a zip file, but when it is expanded it is not a Mac application. This website needs a lot of work.

    Posted 03/23/2013
  • propertyspeed10
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    reliable project. thanks

    Posted 03/05/2013
  • hairnnailcom
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    After 20 minutes of war against the installer I run it on my PC and later on MAC, can do a really nice PDF shots with Scribus! Thank you

    Posted 02/12/2013
  • dillanrobinson
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    great app, works nicely

    Posted 02/11/2013
  • robertdi
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Scribus is a great program if you want to produce clean, professional-looking publications. I publish a monthly 32-page magazine, and I like the lockable text boxes, which can be sized and positioned precisely, text-linked quickly and easily, resized, moved around, without losing the links if you don't want to, so I can keep the boxes for the next issue, or change them easily as needed. Scribus is a more of a challenge than other programs, partly because they seem to have more and better programmers than manual writers! But the results are well worth it. I used Scribus years ago, was told to change software (for a reason that turned out wrong), used other, paid programs, and came back to Scribus because I liked it better. My readers tell me they like the magazine better, too.

    Posted 01/19/2013
  • isaiahharrison
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Easy to install and use.

    Posted 01/18/2013
Show next 25 reviews