-
Hello Gianugo,
I appreciate your replies!
I would very much like to see that Christmas present. We have heard rumors that JIRA 4.0 support will not involve Terracotta. If there is truth to this, how will the solution be implemented? We are currently evaluating what Scarlet will do for us and are torn between using JIRA 3 versus 4. We would like to upgrade to JIRA 4 in a few weeks...
2009-11-02 17:22:37 UTC by terris
-
Terris,
some quick answers to your questions:
1. I'm afraid there is no estimate as of now when it comes to installations. I know for a fact of four, but being Open Source there is a good chance there are more.
2. Scarlet makes Jira scale horizontally, so it's not partitioning projects or doing anything of that sort. You will be able to increase your capacity across the line...
2009-10-27 22:01:25 UTC by gianugo
-
Hello,
Is there a rough estimate regarding the number of Scarlet installations?
Does scarlet exist to enable JIRA to have a larger number of issues (a) per project or (b) aggregated across all projects or (c) both?
Is there an estimated delivery timeframe for JIRA 4.0 support?
Thank you!
Terris.
2009-10-26 19:18:25 UTC by terris
-
I'm interested in chatting with someone who has used Scarlet. How many JIRA issues do you have and what does your hardware and software configuration look like? Willing to pay for $100 for up to an hour of your time.
2009-10-22 18:40:25 UTC by terris
-
gianugo added sannegrinovero to the Scarlet project.
2009-07-30 15:40:36 UTC by gianugo
-
Hi Kaise,
Me too i've set up the architecture described by Sergio (Scarlet with 2 terracotta servers in active/passive mode) and works fine. In fact there is some configuration to add to tc-config.xml in order to declare the 2 servers, the port that they use to and some other stuff. You need a load balancer up front in order to point your client nodes to the ip address (or alias) of your load...
2009-07-17 09:10:38 UTC by massyl
-
Hi Kaise,
let me briefly expand on #1 solution.
Terracotta provides for free active/passive server clustering, as described here: http://www.terracotta.org/web/display/docs/Configuring+Terracotta+For+High+Availability
As you may see, you could have an highly available Terracotta cluster by simply tweaking the XML configuration file: Sourcesense used such a configuration for an important...
2009-07-15 09:50:52 UTC by sbtourist
-
Kaise,
there are two solutions to your problem:
1. if you want to stick to the Open Source version of Scarlet (and the underlying Terracotta server), you can build a Terracotta active/passive cluster. This is a bit clumsy as it would require a bit of work in making everything work (basically it's "old school" clustering with two machines, shared storage, and some clever software...
2009-07-15 09:28:36 UTC by gianugo
-
Dear All,
I've installed a JIRA multi clusterred environment consists of two front end servers for JIRA , one server for TerraCotta .
This environment is working fine with me without any issues , however , i've got a high availability requirement to have 0 down time for my solution .
This new requirement stems for a very basic question , if the Terracotta server wents down, that means all...
2009-07-15 09:17:02 UTC by kaise80
-
Folks,
it's good to see the uptake of Scarlet, with many of you using it. I thought I'd send a request for your assistance and see if/how you can help moving the project forward.
As you know, Scarlet is an Open Source extension, and we intend to keep it as open as possible for the foreseeable future. We also need to make it sustainable, though, and this is where you can help by providing...
2009-07-10 09:00:26 UTC by gianugo
