alpha

User Ratings

63% recommended
 
 
65
38

Rate rarcrack

How would you rate rarcrack?





Express yourself: log in to write a review.

User Reviews

Sort By
Most Helpful
Filter
All
  • Posted by Lucas — 2012-11-13

    Easy to use and works.

  • Posted by josh rogers — 2012-09-15

    no trouble to install and run, works nicely.

  • Posted by Steven Pockspen — 2012-08-05

    rarcrack is a joke. The developer pooched the printf function such that the only way it runs is with the "--type rar" switch (it cannot detect normally), and the password generated is NEVER correct. I created an RAR with a password to see. It NEVER found the password, but dutifully spat out a password and called it good. That is a two hour span I'll never get back.

  • Posted by Strypey — 2012-06-18

    When I tried to Make I got: gcc -pthread rarcrack.c `xml2-config --libs --cflags` -O2 -o rarcrack rarcrack.c: In function ‘crack_thread’: rarcrack.c:206:32: warning: comparison between pointer and integer rarcrack.c: In function ‘init’: rarcrack.c:283:6: warning: format ‘%s’ expects type ‘char *’, but argument 3 has type ‘char (*)[300]’ rarcrack.c:317:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘fscanf’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result rarcrack.c: In function ‘crack_thread’: rarcrack.c:205:11: warning: ignoring return value of ‘fgets’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result I carried on with the install and it seemed to work, but when I ran it on a file it just said: RarCrack! 0.2 by David Zoltan Kedves (kedazo@gmail.com) Not too helpful, all in all.

  • Posted by Max — 2012-03-28

    Reliable and stable, thanks rarcrack

Read more reviews