User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
9
0
0
0
1
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
Write a Review

User Reviews

  • ianrichardson
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Great tool

    Posted 02/15/2013
  • maxgarcia
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Recomendo

    Posted 01/21/2013
  • maxgomes
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    thank you rapidxml

    Posted 12/20/2012
  • alexandercox
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Love rapidxml

    Posted 10/29/2012
  • joshrogers
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Easy to use and works.

    Posted 09/16/2012
  • freundt
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Quite buggy! Especially with large buggy XML inputs. No namespace support (WHY?!). I ended up hand-rolling my own expat-based parser.

    Posted 08/21/2012
  • gmsb
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I have used rapidxml-1.13, and the version 'hidden' inside Boost.PropertyTree. It's simple to operate, and without many lines of code I was able to add XML Namespaces (prefix mapping) support and create a visitor to adapt to a parser-neutral SAX2 interface, so I could change over from another parser.

    Posted 04/26/2012
  • aaronchase
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Great app rapidxml

    Posted 03/26/2012
  • yodaj
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    good job

    Posted 07/11/2011
  • timurhai
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Clean structure, even no docs needed. Easy to integrate - headers only.

    Posted 03/15/2011