RapidXml

User Ratings

95% recommended

Clean structure, even no docs needed. Easy to integrate - headers only.

Quite buggy! Especially with large buggy XML inputs. No namespace support (WHY?!). I ended up hand-rolling my own expat-based parser.

Express yourself: log in to write a review.

Posted by Timur Hairulin — 2011-03-15

Clean structure, even no docs needed. Easy to integrate - headers only.
Posted by Alexander — 2012-10-29

Love rapidxml
Posted by josh rogers — 2012-09-16

Easy to use and works.
Posted by Sebastian Freundt — 2012-08-21

Quite buggy! Especially with large buggy XML inputs. No namespace support (WHY?!). I ended up hand-rolling my own expat-based parser.
Posted by Gareth Sylvester-Bradley — 2012-04-26

I have used rapidxml-1.13, and the version 'hidden' inside Boost.PropertyTree. It's simple to operate, and without many lines of code I was able to add XML Namespaces (prefix mapping) support and create a visitor to adapt to a parser-neutral SAX2 interface, so I could change over from another parser.
Posted by Aaron — 2012-03-26

Great app rapidxml