User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
42
0
0
1
2
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 2 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 3 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
Write a Review

User Reviews

  • moonlqer
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    this project very useful.

    Posted 11/12/2014
  • undeadblow
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I love it!

    Posted 09/29/2014
  • vkni
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I would not recommend using this library since authors break API not only between major updates (5 -> 6), but also between minor updates (6.0.2 -> 6.1.0). Relying on such idiots typically costs a lot of time. Also, it is very stupid to use file naming scheme different from one of Qt. It makes client source code inconsistent (compare #include <QWidget> and #include <qwt_plot.h> instead of #include <QwtPlot>)

    Posted 02/22/2014
  • charlesypater
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Thanks guys, you really are the best!

    Posted 06/22/2013
  • robertoharris00
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I would've recommended it if it wasnt for a confusing GUI.

    Posted 06/22/2013
  • rickysabio00
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I really love the GUI, one of the best.

    Posted 06/22/2013
  • kimmlian9
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Love it Love it! what more can i say?

    Posted 06/22/2013
  • cherylgardner
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Thanks for so usefull software.

    Posted 06/11/2013
  • blaskrusik1978
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    very good project, thanks!

    Posted 04/06/2013
  • adamsilva
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    good job qwt

    Posted 02/13/2013
  • kalebhartman
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    good job qwt

    Posted 01/18/2013
  • lukaswhite
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Fast and simple.

    Posted 12/15/2012
  • mannas
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Easy install and setup! works great.

    Posted 10/26/2012
  • oliverspencer
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    good job qwt

    Posted 10/25/2012
  • vacclean
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Good well-structured code and seems quite stable. The provided Examples help but docs could do with more overview items and drawing together of the topics. Qdos to the devs though!

    Posted 10/21/2012
  • maria1985
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    This is an AWESOME piece of software!!!

    Posted 09/12/2012
  • ryanparker
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    excellent app

    Posted 09/10/2012
  • oid-3893373
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Developers familiar with Qt know that its strengths lie in an easy to use API, extensive documentation and generally being a fairly comprehensive framework. Unfortunately, one thing the Qt framework is missing is an out of the box charting solution. This is where Qwt steps in. It is built upon Qt and offers a fair selection of 2d charts. Sounds good. Unfortunately it isn't. I have no doubt the author (Uwe Rathmann) is an experienced programmer, particularly with Qt, but Qwt shares non-of the user friendly advantages that Qt provides. The documentation is not easy to follow. The API is not intuitive. It is inefficient in many places. And is far from bug free. Qwt enjoys it's own sub section over at QtCentre where you will be able to interact directly with Uwe and another (rather terse) developer called Wysota. We use it because there is no alternative and we are not given time to roll our own (which I would love to do). If you love the ease at which you can use Qt do not expect the same experience from Qwt. Sadly, whilst Qwt is the best charting library for Qt, that does not mean it is good.

    Posted 06/25/2012
  • basudevc
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Kudos to the author. Excellent library. Some real documentation (concise tutorials building up concepts, as opposed to doxygenated source code) would help make this way better, and help the library establish itself even more. Some don't see it as a viable library just because of the lack of documentation (I consider that unfortunate).

    Posted 06/18/2012
  • remnacasarv
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Best available!

    Posted 06/13/2012
  • resttuareale
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    always reliable.

    Posted 06/13/2012
  • wabudbullper
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Thanks!

    Posted 06/09/2012
  • apsoivoipres
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    One of the first utilities I load on every new PC.

    Posted 06/06/2012
  • litbgensubsters
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Best utility on the market

    Posted 06/06/2012
  • preseronin
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I install it on every computer I repair and don't forget :)

    Posted 06/05/2012
Show next 20 reviews