User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
14
0
0
0
0
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5

Rate This Project
Login To Rate This Project

User Reviews

  • nglazerdev said it all - I couldn't have said it better. I also have used this on several medical device projects, all bare metal, one class III and one class II. QM takes a while to learn but is completely worth it. QP is the best state machine tool there is.
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • It looks complex, actually it is, but it has what you will need. The collection comes with a ready architecture. What you only have to do is to understand the framework and design your application, incrementally. It is worth to learn. It is not an extraordinary, non-standart tool. It is a real software engineering implementation.
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • With many details said by different people, this project seems to be so complete I can't add except it is perfect. Greatest thanks to developers.
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • QP and all of the associated tools are great. I have used QP/C++ in multiple projects; on bare metal TI chips and in Linux on the i.MX6. It perfectly captures and combines model-based generative programming, hierarchical state machines, the actor model, and reactive event-based programming. It is well worth the time to learn the framework and the associated concepts. It greatly reduces the boilerplate code and design work needed to do even complex projects. QP is lightweight, fast, and has a small footprint, as well as being appropriate for safety critical systems. Support for QP is very good with quick and in-depth responses from the community and Quantum Leaps. I highly recommend QP!
    5 users found this review helpful.
  • A Master piece. It worth well the spent time to learn it. Once done, so powerful and natural for an embedded programmer whose state machines are the basic tool. After using MicroCOS-II for a while, I use QPC++ on QK kernel for 5 years for a critical project and I can't imagine doing otherwise. Everything falls at the right place on the right time : the concept, the framework, the kernel (QK) and the associated tools are of first class (a bit less for QM in team developed projects). Yes it is different, but it's as different as the wrong way is compared to the right way of doing things. The support is so great, so clear and so FAST ! Not convinced, please read the introduction papers on the state-machine.com site.
    3 users found this review helpful.
  • Herausragend, wahrscheinlich das beste Gesamtpaket, dass man bekommen kann, wenn man ein strukturiertes und dokumentiertes embedded Programmiersystem sucht.
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • Perfect HSM model.It fits embedded projects.
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • So excellent!
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • So excellent!
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • QP is fantastic!
  • Thanks for Qpc, it's perfect!
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • good job
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • Miro does an excellent job of supporting this product. In the last couple of weeks I have submitted two requests for clarification and he has gotten back in less than a day. I encourage anyone who want to learn a new way of thinking and coding that results in better, much better, code right away consider this product.
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • The QP State Machine Framework should be in every embedded developer's toolkit. Virtually every embedded system is event-driven (even cyclical / periodic systems are event-driven - the event is a timer timeout!), and thus the QP can be used in a huge variety of systems, ranging from tiny low-power devices to very large distributed systems with thousands of states and objects. The QP supports FSMs and HSMs in C and C++. The active object computing model (active object = state machine + thread + message queue) is exploited to obtain ultra-efficient processing of events. Also the licensing model is very reasonable, especially when you consider what you get (including excellent & speedy support) -- a hierarchical event processor, a framework for event driven applications (memory / event pools, timers, garbage collection, zero copy event posting, broadcast & direct post, etc...) Also the QF can sit on top of any RTOS, a lean & fast preemptive kernel named QK, or even a simple non-preemtpive kernel. There's even a very small lightweight version called QP-nano that is tailored for memory & CPU-constrained systems. The best part: you spend your time focusing on identifying your system's states & events, and implementing your design in the QP, instead of writing the infrastructure ("reinventing the wheel"). In short: get the book, download the code, build the examples, and evaluate the QP for use in your system.
    4 users found this review helpful.