User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
8
0
0
0
1
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
Write a Review

User Reviews

  • mitali3011
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Hi, I am working on a player/stage project which currently has 3 (Later it will be extended to 6) iRobots -Roomba. As suggested in Jenny Owen's Tutorial on player/stage , I was giving different port numbers to each one of the robots. Here is my .cfg file : driver ( name "stage" provides [ "simulation:0"] plugin "stageplugin" worldfile "pacman.world" ) driver ( name "stage" provides [ "6665:position2d:0" ] model "pacman" ) driver ( name "stage" provides ["6666:position2d:0" ] model "ghost1" ) driver ( name "stage" provides ["6667:position2d:0" ] model "ghost1" ) But, I am getting this error when I am running ./ghost1 and ./ghost2 : playerc error : got NACK from request The simulator is not able to run the other two robots, I guess. Kindly help me in this regard.

    Posted 09/04/2013
  • mitali3011
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Hi, I am working on a player/stage project which currently has 3 (Later it will be extended to 6) iRobots -Roomba. As suggested in Jenny Owen's Tutorial on player/stage , I was giving different port numbers to each one of the robots. Here is my .cfg file : driver ( name "stage" provides [ "simulation:0"] plugin "stageplugin" worldfile "pacman.world" ) driver ( name "stage" provides [ "6665:position2d:0" ] model "pacman" ) driver ( name "stage" provides ["6666:position2d:0" ] model "ghost1" ) driver ( name "stage" provides ["6667:position2d:0" ] model "ghost1" ) But, I am getting this error when I am running ./ghost1 and ./ghost2 : playerc error : got NACK from request The simulator is not able to run the other two robots, I guess. Kindly help me in this regard.

    Posted 09/04/2013
  • ivanhutchins
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Easy for use.

    Posted 06/07/2013
  • danwyl
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I am not able to see the video of these tutorials. If I could it is really a good job

    Posted 10/21/2012
  • theirchild
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    It works. It supports pretty much everything you can think of. It doesn't crash in the hands of a casual user.

    Posted 10/21/2012
  • vijaykumar6
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I love this Project

    Posted 04/06/2011
  • wujekzbyszek
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    very good project

    Posted 02/25/2011
  • bcod
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    lovely

    Posted 05/20/2010
  • pythoncharmer
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Excellent ! ..... if player project was a paid software, I guess it would be so expensive that I would never be able to afford it.

    Posted 03/30/2010