User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
6
0
0
0
0
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5

Rate This Project
Login To Rate This Project

User Reviews

  • Hi can anyone tell me what is this error : playerc warning : warning : [Player v.3.0.2] connected on [localhost:6665] with sock 6 playerc error : got NACK from request playerc error : failed to get response
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • Hi, I am working on a player/stage project which currently has 3 (Later it will be extended to 6) iRobots -Roomba. As suggested in Jenny Owen's Tutorial on player/stage , I was giving different port numbers to each one of the robots. Here is my .cfg file : driver ( name "stage" provides [ "simulation:0"] plugin "stageplugin" worldfile "pacman.world" ) driver ( name "stage" provides [ "6665:position2d:0" ] model "pacman" ) driver ( name "stage" provides ["6666:position2d:0" ] model "ghost1" ) driver ( name "stage" provides ["6667:position2d:0" ] model "ghost1" ) But, I am getting this error when I am running ./ghost1 and ./ghost2 : playerc error : got NACK from request The simulator is not able to run the other two robots, I guess. Kindly help me in this regard.
  • Hi, I am working on a player/stage project which currently has 3 (Later it will be extended to 6) iRobots -Roomba. As suggested in Jenny Owen's Tutorial on player/stage , I was giving different port numbers to each one of the robots. Here is my .cfg file : driver ( name "stage" provides [ "simulation:0"] plugin "stageplugin" worldfile "pacman.world" ) driver ( name "stage" provides [ "6665:position2d:0" ] model "pacman" ) driver ( name "stage" provides ["6666:position2d:0" ] model "ghost1" ) driver ( name "stage" provides ["6667:position2d:0" ] model "ghost1" ) But, I am getting this error when I am running ./ghost1 and ./ghost2 : playerc error : got NACK from request The simulator is not able to run the other two robots, I guess. Kindly help me in this regard.
  • Easy for use.
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • lovely
  • Excellent ! ..... if player project was a paid software, I guess it would be so expensive that I would never be able to afford it.