Subscribe

PersonTypeByMaritalStatus is Atemporal?

  1. 2012-10-21 05:15:43 PDT
    How do I represent the relationships of a person who marries in 2000, divorces in 2001, cohabits in 2002, becomes single in 2003 (i.e., stops cohabiting), marries (someone else) in 2004, becomes a widow(er) in 2005? Marital status changes over time, so I believe that PersonTypeByMaritalStatus simply cannot be Atemporal.
  2. 2012-10-22 08:00:30 PDT
    You would use #$maritalStatus (or #$isa) to relate the individual to one of the various instances of PersonTypeByMaritalStatus. Those assertions can go in temporal contexts (temporal microtheories) . #$PersonTypeByMaritalStatus is itself atemporal because it is a collection of collections not a collection of persons -- It has its various instances like #$Married, #$Divorced, etc. atemporally and essentially.
Jump To:
< Previous | 1 | Next >

Add a Reply

This forum does not allow anonymous participation.

Log in to add a reply. Not registered? Create an account to participate and receive email updates when replies are posted to this topic.