beta

User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
11
0
0
0
0
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
Write a Review

User Reviews

  • ianrichardson
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    odin-win works perfectly.

    Posted 02/13/2013
  • a11922256
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Good and useful software

    Posted 12/18/2012
  • lukemorgan
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    odin-win is fast and easy to use

    Posted 12/17/2012
  • blakeprice
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Great project

    Posted 10/25/2012
  • williamfischer
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    deseo bajar odin-win gratis

    Posted 09/08/2012
  • toebens
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    works very nice (recovery with hirens bootcd) - only thing missing is to restore a single file/folder from the image (there is no image browser) - because of that i have to keep driveimage xml - unfortunately

    Posted 09/06/2012
  • jeffkwas
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Very straightforward. Simple. I have tested it on Windows Server 2003 and 2008 without a problem. Keep up the good work and perhaps add scheduling built-in to the GUI.

    Posted 05/03/2012
  • adriankit
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I hope this project continues to develop, as it is very useful to have a disk imaging utility that can be run fully from the command line, and thus via scripts. It is also good that an option to split the image into chunks is included. However, at present, it is practical only to run it in that way, as it is very slow (even without 'chunking'). Imaging a system partition containing ~35GB data to file on another partition on the same physical disk takes nearly an hour at ~10MB/s (Intel Core i3@2.53GHz, SATA-II 320GB). SelfImage (not command line enabled, nor 'chunkable') manages ~40MB/s, and is thus a better option for attended imaging.

    Posted 04/14/2012
  • jacobbrooks
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Easy to install and use.

    Posted 03/22/2012
  • oid-3320593
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    It seems to be a really nice project. It definitely needs some work, but I give it 7/10 stars for functionality and effort.

    Posted 04/01/2011
  • wujekzbyszek
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    very good project

    Posted 02/24/2011