-
When configuring without C99 flags, I end up with HAVE__BOOL defined as 1, and HAVE_STDBOOL_H undefined. I'm not sure how the HAVE__BOOL test could actually fail, though, based upon the relevant excerpt from the config.log (see attached).
I tried commenting out the test on HAVE__BOOL in syscfg.h to see what would happen, and received a make error there, which implied that it WAS defined...
2010-01-06 21:26:49 UTC by https://www.google.com/accounts
-
Added ti 4,4 abd 4,5.
2010-01-06 17:40:12 UTC by sfeam
-
sfeam committed patchset 7192 of module gnuplot to the gnuplot development CVS repository, changing 7 files.
2010-01-06 17:35:10 UTC by sfeam
-
sfeam committed patchset 7191 of module gnuplot to the gnuplot development CVS repository, changing 7 files.
2010-01-06 17:29:02 UTC by sfeam
-
Hello everybody,
first of all I want to say that I really appreciate this patch. I really needed this functionallity. I hope it will make it to the public version.
Now, that I have worked some time with stats, I would like to suggest another way of invoking the stats functionallity. Because, I have not yet read the source code, I don't know if it is possible.
Instead of invoking stats before...
2010-01-06 14:29:02 UTC by bugware
-
Since the va_copy and va_end are not necessary for
the MSC case I tend to move them in the
#else block (probably even together with the
declaration of the args_copied variable), but I have
no strong preference for either solution.
2010-01-06 12:23:52 UTC by taschna
-
I found another workaround:
#ifndef va_copy
/* WARNING - DANGER - ASSUMES TYPICAL STACK MACHINE */
#define va_copy(dst, src) ((void)((dst) = (src)))
#endif
Which solutions is preferrable?
Best regards.
2010-01-06 11:43:35 UTC by bugware
-
The change to not_a_number works for me (see revised patch), sorry
for the LINUX breakage!
2010-01-06 06:45:46 UTC by taschna
-
Unfortunately, this patch doesn't work on linux (or any c99 compliant environment, I suspect) because there is a name conflict with the function nan() already in glibc. The glibc nan(*tagp) function takes an argument, so you can't just substitute the new definition instead.
I suggest to rename your new function to something else, maybe not_a_number().
It's a trivial change, but could you...
2010-01-06 05:06:01 UTC by sfeam
-
That seems wrong.
The section of header code that I quoted before is supposed to be detecting this and executing the lines
#ifdef __cplusplus
typedef bool _Bool;
If you could sort out what combination of tests and flags is causing the logic to fail, that might tell us how to fix it.
On the basis of the log output you sent, I am guessing that the following patch would fix things for...
2010-01-05 20:52:03 UTC by sfeam
