User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
13
1
0
0
1
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 3 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5
Write a Review

User Reviews

  • hibou-57
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    It would just need a clean/readable API documentation to get five stars (I gave four). A comment aside: I wish file systems was designed with abstract data source in mind instead of just hard storage in mind (and thus, for all OS)… but that's another story.

    Posted 01/07/2014
  • anitahulsey
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Thank you for your work.

    Posted 06/06/2013
  • tfileme
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Thanks for updates ;)

    Posted 05/12/2013
  • kufakhan
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    good system

    Posted 01/23/2013
  • unxed
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Please add this link: hg.sharesource.org/fuse4win to "Operating Systems" wiki page. It is FUSE API implementation for Windows platform using Dokan framework. (stable enough: ntfs-3g is said to be working)

    Posted 01/21/2013
  • particjohn
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Wonderful job, thanks a ton for conveying

    Posted 10/29/2012
  • tratonic
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    This is a really good project!

    Posted 10/21/2012
  • ivankon631
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Thank you, guys.

    Posted 06/03/2012
  • villakoni
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    very good project

    Posted 06/03/2012
  • jonahharvey698
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    fast download and works, recommended.

    Posted 03/14/2012
  • precoginmen
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Beneficial job, thanks a lot for writing

    Posted 03/09/2012
  • selistimen
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Wonderful job, thanks a ton for conveying

    Posted 03/05/2012
  • wujekzbyszek
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    very good project

    Posted 02/13/2011
  • sig-sf
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Overall it's great and I recognize its potential, yeeeeet documentation is miserable: at least I want specifications covering fuse_operations. But you know, I like this!

    Posted 01/23/2011
  • netom
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Great software! Documentation could be better ;)

    Posted 05/01/2010