beta

User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
11
0
0
2
2
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 2 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 3 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 3 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 3 / 5
Write a Review

User Reviews

  • j7nj7n
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    User interface based on GTK, which means it is unresponsive and ugly, especially under Windows classic theme. Much larger, *bloated* binaries than competing products. The GUI does not clearly expose all possible compression options. I did not find a way, through the GUI, to set a reasonable dictionary size between very extreme values. It is easy to create archives that require too much memory even when this is not warranted because the data set does not contain too much similarity. The unpopular format, with a generic name "arc", which has nothing in common with older DOS-era compressors of the same name, means that archives created with this tool may be difficult to extract on obsolete OS, by other people, or in the future. Compact self-extractor modules are provided to avert this issue. It is probably safer to make all archives as EXE files for now. Large installers produced in Russia are sometimes in this "arc" format. FreeArc might prove useful in extracting them, should they fail to unpack themselves. One such download was the reason I found this tool. I have got an impression that this "arc" is a rather "loose" standard, similar to what ZIP has become. It is possible to install a number of "preprocessors" in FreeArc for recompressing different already compressed data formats. They may or may not be present in another installation of FreeArc, and what seems like a perfectly solid archive may suddenly fail to extract. This archiver's basic advantage over better known formats like RAR, ZIP or ACE is its support for extremely large dictionaries (with corresponding memory consumption). But it has come too late. 7-Zip and now also WinRAR (less effectively) already provide them.

    Posted 11/24/2014
  • nooitgedacht
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    I'm not impressed with FreeArc. I have tried on some computers and I noticed that there is no support of hyper-threading and no possibility of multiple CPU's. The speed isn't very improved as the latest versions of RAR and 7zip. The GUI of this program looks well, but some features cannot be saved as desired for default settings. Binary files are the most times bit bigger after compression, in size than RAR and 7zip.

    Posted 10/24/2014
  • vescudero
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Awesome compressor. I'd love to see the day in which srep gets included in the main branch. This way we will be able to make self extracting archives without the need to send the srep.ext binary.

    Posted 06/17/2013
  • psycommando
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    This program does some incredible compression with its .arc archive format ! It beats 7-zip in resulting archive size in some cases ! For example : 615mb registry image .reg file -> 7z( Ultra LZMA2 ) = resulting archive size 17.6 mb in ~2 minutes -> freearc ( Ultra + "protection: Add (autosize, 1-4%): " ) = resulting archive size 15.5 mb (14.9mb without recovery data ) in ~3 minutes Too bad there aren't any updated versions since 2010.. And also, its such a shame that the documentation for customizing the compression is offline though.. But the presets do an ok job.

    Posted 05/14/2013
  • elliotking
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    freearc works great

    Posted 02/17/2013
  • nicolascook
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    O melhor programa para compartilhamento

    Posted 01/21/2013
  • lucasedwards
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    freearc works great

    Posted 12/20/2012
  • dominiccook
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Love that its free

    Posted 10/30/2012
  • silttor
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Good job. Pleasantly surprised.

    Posted 10/20/2012
  • joehamilton
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    good work

    Posted 09/17/2012
  • evanmathews
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    good project freearc

    Posted 03/21/2012
  • baragoz12
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    If u haven't tried using this a single,give it a go.Seems fantastic and has all proggies u would wish,is pleasurable.Plenty of do the job put into this 1.I try every single a single that comes out.

    Posted 12/16/2011
  • oid-3552627
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    It looks like that the installer is infected! Check it out: http://www.virustotal.com/file-scan/report.html?id=6539dcec7fc5f5a62e0b44dd6f796a7ef7a09c16ec43d100ac2e6ffc74a8faba-1314458962

    Posted 09/20/2011
  • giorgiotani
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Very promising archiver, with powerful and efficient compression and impressive set of useful features.

    Posted 10/29/2010
  • qm3stone
    1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5

    Kaspersky found Trojan within file. Sounded like a great program too!!!

    Posted 09/04/2010