Framewave

anyways :)

what's up with framewave no (official) response in over two months?

should i perhaps move/copy all of my 'points'/issues to the tracker?

i certainly hope framewave is not 'dead'...

while here i'll add another point :) 25. the supposed advantage of having one dll per library as opposed to on dll per optimization target per library (as ipp has) is completely moot imo...it makes for less efficient code... ...the ipp approach makes the optimization/architecture target desicion only once (when loading the main dll)...you 'directly' (through a function pointer) call the function for your architecture...with framewave you make the 'switch-on-architecture' on every call...