A simple scientific calculator for complex number calculation. It requires the GTK+ toolkit.
Be the first to post a text review of cgtkcalc. Rate and review a project by clicking thumbs up or thumbs down in the right column.
ver. 2.1.9 (August, 2007) o Copy.c has been modified to use the cast (guchar *) in order to avoid an ugly warning that appears when gcc 4.1.x is used. o Faq-jp has been improved. o Recent RPM does not accept the tag Copyright in a spec file. Thus the Licence tag is used from this version. I cannot hide my complaint this time. Such a standard tool used by most softwares should preserve backward compatibility. Otherwise, a software must be scared for creeping obsoletion.
ver. 2.1.9 (August, 2007) o Copy.c has been modified to use the cast (guchar *) in order to avoid an ugly warning that appears when gcc 4.1.x is used. o Faq-jp has been improved. o Recent RPM does not accept the tag Copyright in a spec file. Thus the Licence tag is used from this version. I cannot hide my complaint this time. Such a standard tool used by most softwares should preserve backward compatibility. Otherwise, a software must be scared for creeping obsoletion.
ver. 2.1.9 (August, 2007) o Copy.c has been modified to use the cast (guchar *) in order to avoid an ugly warning that appears when gcc 4.1.x is used. o Faq-jp has been improved. o Recent RPM does not accept the tag Copyright in a spec file. Thus the Licence tag is used from this version. I cannot hide my complaint this time. Such a standard tool used by most softwares should preserve backward compatibility. Otherwise, a software must be scared for creeping obsoletion.
ver. 2.1.9 (August, 2007) o Copy.c has been modified to use the cast (guchar *) in order to avoid an ugly warning that appears when gcc 4.1.x is used. o Faq-jp has been improved. o Recent RPM does not accept the tag Copyright in a spec file. Thus the Licence tag is used from this version. I cannot hide my complaint this time. Such a standard tool used by most softwares should preserve backward compatibility. Otherwise, a software must be scared for creeping obsoletion.
ver. 2.1.9 (August, 2007) o Copy.c has been modified to use the cast (guchar *) in order to avoid an ugly warning that appears when gcc 4.1.x is used. o Faq-jp has been improved. o Recent RPM does not accept the tag Copyright in a spec file. Thus the Licence tag is used from this version. I cannot hide my complaint this time. Such a standard tool used by most softwares should preserve backward compatibility. Otherwise, a software must be scared for creeping obsoletion.
ver. 2.1.9 (August, 2007) o Copy.c has been modified to use the cast (guchar *) in order to avoid an ugly warning that appears when gcc 4.1.x is used. o Faq-jp has been improved. o Recent RPM does not accept the tag Copyright in a spec file. Thus the Licence tag is used from this version. I cannot hide my complaint this time. Such a standard tool used by most softwares should preserve backward compatibility. Otherwise, a software must be scared for creeping obsoletion.
ver. 2.1.9 (August, 2007) o Copy.c has been modified to use the cast (guchar *) in order to avoid an ugly warning that appears when gcc 4.1.x is used. o Faq-jp has been improved. o Recent RPM does not accept the tag Copyright in a spec file. Thus the Licence tag is used from this version. I cannot hide my complaint this time. Such a standard tool used by most softwares should preserve backward compatibility. Otherwise, a software must be scared for creeping obsoletion.
Be the first person to add a text review.
Copyright © 2009 Geeknet, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use
Thanks for your rating!
Would you also like to write a review?