Donate Share

ccrypt

Code

Programming Languages: C

License: GNU General Public License (GPL)

Show:

What's happening?

  • Comment: ccrypt parallel build fails

    How embarrassing. :) Thank you. That fixed it. http://trac.macports.org/changeset/57344.

    2009-09-10 03:55:16 UTC by ryandesign

  • Comment: ccrypt parallel build fails

    Thanks for your detailed log. I can now reproduce this behavior. It is not a bug. The problem is your invocation of "make check -j3 all", which is not valid. What will happen is that you have one process building "check" in each subdirectory, and another process building "all" in each subdirectory at the same time. Since "all" is a prerequisite for "check", these parallel processes will then...

    2009-09-10 03:37:25 UTC by selinger

  • Comment: ccrypt parallel build fails

    Apologies for not showing enough output before. I have now attached the complete log of a build failure with an unpatched ccrypt 1.9. The issue is intermittent but not difficult for me to reproduce.

    2009-09-10 02:13:26 UTC by ryandesign

  • Comment: .NET Equivalent for CCrypt

    Dear Karthick, I am not aware of a .NET port or bindings for ccrypt. However, ccrypt already provides an API for C in form of the ccryptlib library. It should be technically easy to link this into a .NET project. Moreover, with the attached patch, the bindings will also work for C++. When integrating ccrypt into any Microsoft based project, please be sure to follow the terms of the GNU...

    2009-09-10 01:26:53 UTC by selinger

  • Comment: ccrypt parallel build fails

    Actually, I don't think my patch will fix this problem. Looking at the last few lines of your build log, I am pretty sure that the error was not caused by 'maketables'. Unfortunately, you did not include enough of the build log to see what might have caused this error. In a parallel build, several processes write to the log at the same time, and this error was likely caused by something...

    2009-09-09 20:50:15 UTC by selinger

  • .NET API for Ccrypt

    Hi, We are building a interface for processing Ccrypt encrypted files from SFTP to other vendors using Microsoft based middleware. So we are looking for a .NET equivalent to Ccrypt algorithm or API for the same. Does anyone here has implemented it in .NET or heard of any API which can be called using .NET ? I’m looking for your valuable feedback. Cheers, Karthick G.

    2009-09-09 14:48:16 UTC by karthickgsf

  • .NET Equivalent for CCrypt

    Hi, We are building a interface for processing Ccrypt encrypted files from SFTP to other vendors using Microsoft based middleware. So we are looking for a .NET equivalent to Ccrypt algorithm or API for the same. Does anyone here has implemented it in .NET or heard of any API which can be called using .NET ? I’m looking for your valuable feedback. Cheers, Karthick G.

    2009-09-09 14:41:10 UTC by karthickgsf

  • Comment: Build Problem On Stratus VOS 17.0.1ax

    I just verified that the patch works correctly. Please apply the patch to a fresh copy of ccrypt-1.9, and not to a previously patched copy.

    2009-09-08 14:19:00 UTC by selinger

  • Comment: Build Problem On Stratus VOS 17.0.1ax

    Hello Maintainer I tried applying the latest patch. However it told me that they were already applied. I manually checked the files also. They were already applied. The makefile.in was also already patched. bash-2.05$ patch --input myDiff --backup patching file ChangeLog Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] n Apply anyway? [n] n Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored...

    2009-09-08 04:32:36 UTC by bornlibra23

  • Comment: Build Problem On Stratus VOS 17.0.1ax

    Hi, yes, you have to re-run automake and autoconf for this patch to take effect. If this is a problem, you can use the attached ccrypt-1.9-patch2-ac.diff instead, which also patches the Makefile.in and configure (you still have to run configure). The reason you were still unable to build the checks was because your Makefile wasn't updated. FYI, the link to "attach a file" is below...

    2009-09-07 21:48:49 UTC by selinger

Our Numbers