From: Clark C . E. <cc...@cl...> - 2001-11-10 15:10:21
|
| > We may want to consider letting implicit scalars | > work with the next line scalar... that would be | > consistent with allowing implicit scalars as keys | > (and probably make the productions easier). | | The current wording does not distinguish between | next-line and in-line scalars as far as implicit | typing is concerned. I don't see a reason to | change it. Ok. | Hmmm - this means \- scalars are still implicitly | typed (unless starting with an alpha), right? | The '-' just forces treating the value as | unquoted, period. That seems simpler. I'd like the trailing - to remove all "magic", both implicit types and quoting. Best, Clark |