From: Oren Ben-K. <or...@ri...> - 2001-10-27 07:13:00
|
Brian wrote: > > I am now :-) But I have breakfast to make and a Windsurfing session to > > attend soon. > > Sounds fun. The down side is that skiing season is really short here :-) At any rate, I'm signing off for the rest of the day - be back online in 12 hours or so. > > A final note: would these be members of the 'null' implicit type? If > > so we should rename it to "none", I think, as these two new values > > aren't nulls: > > I would just make them !null, !empty_list, and !empty_map. Hmmm. "empty_list" is hardly a type all by itself... > ... My only remaining issue is what they look like as top level > productions: How about: !none ~: > --- > ~: > ___ > : > ~: > --- > > The first is nicer, but I disallowed unmarked scalars in a previous > post. Why, exactly? I didn't follow the reasoning there. > PS 'seperate' is really 'separate' I believe. And don't I know it! However, my fingers don't :-) Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki |