From: trans. (T. Onoma) <tra...@ru...> - 2004-09-11 16:38:51
|
On Saturday 11 September 2004 12:17 pm, Clark C. Evans wrote: > You don't. =A0This is what styles do. =A0They are all different > ways of writing characters based on specific use cases: > > =A0 plain: most limited style, but unadorned, simple > =A0 double: you can express any unicode character here, but it is tedious > =A0 single: good for strings with indicators and lots of \ and " > =A0 folded: good for paragraphs where word-wrapping is not significant > =A0 literal: good for source code where breaks are significant > > Every one of the styles has a specific rationale for presentation, > they really arn't special tags (which you seem to be trying to > have them be). =A0 If you really want these differentiations just > use !tags that is what they are there for. Okay, I get you.=20 It jsut seems like escaping could be a useful _mode_ for any style. If that= =20 were possible then it would translate into four styles and two modes.=20 How do we _not_ escape literals, for instance?=20 =2D-=20 ( o _ // trans. / \ tra...@ru... I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way. =2DMark Twain |