From: <ir...@ms...> - 2002-09-20 04:37:47
|
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 09:54:58PM -0600, why the lucky stiff wrote: > Clark and I started working through some RELAX-NG examples over IRC. We both > want to see schema talk move forward (as I'm sure others of you do). So I > took my log of our discussion and started jotting the ideas down. Excellent start, Why!! This is exactly what we need. > We don't convert the AddressBook element nor the Card element since > they are more or less XMLisms: Good that you're thinking about what's intrinsically necessary for the data vs what's baggage from the other framework. > - frequency: zeroOrMore Hopefully we can find a more concise term than zeroOrMore, but that's just a minor point. > The syntax thus far comes from Clark and I messing around on IRC. If > you don't like it right away, then no problem. We're not really > advocating any syntax at the moment. We're just going through > examples. I'm not worried about the syntax. We've more or less established that the schema will itself be a YAML document, and beyond that a convenient syntax will eventually emerge. -- -Mike (Iron) Orr, ir...@ms... (if mail problems: ms...@oz...) http://iron.cx/ English * Esperanto * Russkiy * Deutsch * Espan~ol |