From: Tom S. <tra...@tr...> - 2002-09-12 19:06:08
|
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 12:53, Brian Ingerson wrote: > I totally agree with your pretty printing use case. But that can be > accomplished in code without requiring a formal model to be worked out with > all its ramifications and deep seated philosophical issues. all the ramifications? deep seated philosphical issues? this isn't Hegel! :) > YAML.pm has a loader option to load a YAML document into a shadowed native > graph. The shadowing preserves the key order. So when you dump the graph, key > order is preserved. > > YAML.pm also has an option to load a YAML document into non-native graph that > supports key order among other things like style and type uri. This would be > useful to support a YPATH perhaps. you already have most of the functionailty built into the tool already! for heaven sakes, man! what is the problem? > We only need models when a particular cross-platform application with > widespread impact (like ypath) requires it. Frankly, ypath as a specification > hasn't even been started in earnest. perhaps it a good time to ride that pony backwards and see how the implementation effects the model. i'll bite. -- tom sawyer, aka transami tra...@tr... |