From: Elena R. <ele...@gm...> - 2008-05-11 14:30:29
|
Bruce-- On May 9, 2008, at 2:10 PM, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > Maybe this isn't really that complicated though. If someone really > wants to use this method, then they can just add that point locator, > and the CSL logic to print it is easy (and so trivial to implement for > the code). If they don't (I, for example, would just cite the OED > without it), then that's fine too. > > E.g. leave it to the user to determine it through their choice of > whether to indicate the poit locator (or not). > > Does that make sense? So what you're saying, we'll add the locator label to the locales files and the implementor would decide whether to put it in the pulldown menu for the point-locator? That would be great, thanks! If that's your thinking, I'll go ahead and add the locator. Best, Elena > Bruce > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save > $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ > xbiblio-devel mailing list > xbi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel |