From: Jouke V. <jo...@pv...> - 2003-03-26 11:37:15
|
Hi James, I think there are three possibilities: 1. You use Win32::OLE as much as possible, because it's rather stable (but from you earlier post I understood that it's not possible in your case) 2. You wrap the wxAutomationObject yourself (using the XS sample Mattia provided, although I can't give you a link right now) 3. You keep bugging Graciliano for wxActivex so maybe you can co-operate on it. I have used Win32::OLE so far and it worked in my cases (for example the Win32::MSAgent module, which I use in co-operation with wxPerl), but it sure has its limitations. Good luck, Jouke James Lavery wrote: > Hi Mattia and others, > I'm still pursuing my OLE problem, and note that there's a wxActivex > available for wxWindows. Notwithstanding the work which Gracilliano is > doing, is it possible for me to wrap this myself, to make it available > via wxPerl? > > Is there documentation on how to wrap wxWindows classes for use in > wxPerl? > > Thanks, > > James > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! > NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en > _______________________________________________ > wxperl-users mailing list > wxp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxperl-users -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- | pVoice : http://www.pvoice.org | mail : jo...@pv...| | Personal: http://jouke.pvoice.org | phone: +31 6 41813351 | | Resume : http://jouke.pvoice.org/cv.html | fax : +31 10 2430717 | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |