From: shaheed <sr...@ie...> - 2001-07-30 20:25:46
|
On Monday 30 July 2001 3:35 am, Werner Trobin wrote: > Hmm, I intended to draw it exactly that way. Sorry that my ASCII art was > broken (I really should use a proper font). Hehe: at least we agree on the idea! > Hmmm... I'm not very happy with that solution. The reason is that the > conversion doesn't belong to the Parser, but rather to the structures > themselves. Therefore I suggest to have a function which converts > a Word95 structure to a Word97 one... Yeah, sure. I really meant the idea of generating the bulk opf the conversion code. I agree the OO way is the right thing to do. The memset() takes care of those cases where the 97 structure has new fields, and the member-by-member assignment takes care of the change in legal range. > The next question is: Do you (Shaheed), Dom, or someone else have time to > join me? The reason I'm asking is, that we should then discuss who is > going to work on which part in that case. I'm pretty busy right now, but I do hope to help here and there. Given that you have limited time, use me as needed, but its best not to wait for me right now. I will try to heckle you constructively from the back when I can :-) Thanks, Shaheed |